Are the force characteristics of synchronous handcycling affected by speed and the method to impose power?

OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of exercise conditions (speed and method to impose power) on the applied force, force effectiveness and distribution of work during handcycling. METHOD Ten able-bodied men performed handcycling on a treadmill. To test the effect of speed, subjects propelled at different velocities (1.38m/s, 1.66m/s, 1.94m/s) with a constant power output (35W). To test the effect of method to impose power, subjects cycled at a constant speed (1.66m/s) and different power outputs imposed by incline (1%, 2.5%, 4%) versus pulley system (simulated resistance of incline conditions). From the applied forces, fraction of effective force and work production over the propulsion cycle were calculated. RESULTS While total force (24.2 to 18.2N) and tangential force (20.0 to 13.5N) decreased significantly with higher speed, no change in lateral force was observed (3.5 to 2.8N). This resulted in a significant decrease of effectiveness (82.6 to 72.9%) and in a change of relative work distribution over the propulsion cycle (44 to 29.8J). While cycling with the highest velocity, compared to the lower velocities, more work was achieved during pulling and pressing and less work was produced while lifting the crank. No significant differences between the two methods to impose power were found in any parameter (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS When propelling at equal power output, speed influences the force characteristics of handcycling and should be considered when analyzing force application. Since there is no difference in the force characteristics between propelling at an incline versus ground-level, results of studies examining handbike propulsion with either of these methods are largely comparable.

[1]  F Diefenthaeler,et al.  Cadence and workload effects on pedaling technique of well-trained cyclists. , 2008, International journal of sports medicine.

[2]  D J Sanderson,et al.  The influence of cadence and power output on force application and in-shoe pressure distribution during cycling by competitive and recreational cyclists , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Alternative Modes of Manual Wheelchair Ambulation: An Overview , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[5]  Les G Carlton,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic analysis of wheelchair propulsion on ramps of different slopes for young men with paraplegia. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Han Houdijk,et al.  Influence of hand cycling on physical capacity in the rehabilitation of persons with a spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  W. Thörner Trainingsversuche an Hunden , 1930, Arbeitsphysiologie.

[8]  D. Sanderson The influence of cadence and power output on the biomechanics of force application during steady-rate cycling in competitive and recreational cyclists. , 1991, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  Maria T. E. Hopman,et al.  Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[10]  R H Rozendal,et al.  Wheelchair ergonomics and physiological testing of prototypes. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[11]  H E Veeger,et al.  Within-cycle characteristics of the wheelchair push in sprinting on a wheelchair ergometer. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Č. Marinček,et al.  Arm cycloergometry and kinetics of oxygen consumption in paraplegics , 1977, Paraplegia.

[13]  L A Rozendaal,et al.  The push force pattern in manual wheelchair propulsion as a balance between cost and effect. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M L Hull,et al.  A theoretical basis for interpreting the force applied to the pedal in cycling. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  H E Veeger,et al.  Manual wheelchair propulsion: effects of power output on physiology and technique. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  H E J Veeger,et al.  Consequence of feedback-based learning of an effective hand rim wheelchair force production on mechanical efficiency. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Biophysical aspects of submaximal hand cycling. , 2008, International journal of sports medicine.

[18]  K A Mossberg,et al.  COMPARISON OF ASYNCHRONOUS VERSUS SYNCHRONOUS ARM CRANK ERGOMETRY. , 1998 .

[19]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Development and validity of an instrumented handbike: initial results of propulsion kinetics. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  Gerrit Jan VAN INGEN SCHENAU,et al.  From rotation to translation: Constraints on multi-joint movements and the unique action of bi-articular muscles , 1989 .

[21]  T D Noakes,et al.  Metabolic and performance responses to constant-load vs. variable-intensity exercise in trained cyclists. , 1999, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  Yves Vanlandewijck,et al.  Consistency of within-cycle torque distribution pattern in hand cycling. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  H E Veeger,et al.  Handcycling: different modes and gear ratios. , 2000, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[24]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Power output and metabolic cost of synchronous and asynchronous submaximal and peak level hand cycling on a motor driven treadmill in able-bodied male subjects. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  Petra Platen,et al.  Handbiking: Physiological Responses to Synchronous and Asynchronous Crank Montage , 2003 .

[26]  H E Veeger,et al.  Effect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  A physiological comparison of synchronous and asynchronous hand cycling. , 2004, International journal of sports medicine.

[28]  G Mukherjee,et al.  Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[29]  Christian Krämer,et al.  Influence of crank length and crank width on maximal hand cycling power and cadence , 2009, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[30]  D J J Bregman,et al.  Is effective force application in handrim wheelchair propulsion also efficient? , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[31]  R H Rozendal,et al.  The effect of rear wheel camber in manual wheelchair propulsion. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  Philippe Gorce,et al.  A biomechanical analysis of handcycling: a case study. , 2010, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[33]  Christian Krämer,et al.  Effect of different handgrip angles on work distribution during hand cycling at submaximal power levels , 2009, Ergonomics.