Is Preservation In Situ an Unacceptable Option for Development Control? Can Monitoring Prove the Continued Preservation of Waterlogged Deposits?
暂无分享,去创建一个
Tim Malim | Ian Panter | I. Panter | T. Malim
[1] J. Holden,et al. A critical review of hydrological data collection for assessing preservation risk for urban waterlogged archaeology: A case study from the City of York, UK. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.
[2] H. Matthiesen. Detailed chemical analyses of groundwater as a tool for monitoring urban archaeological deposits: results from Bryggen in Bergen , 2008 .
[3] P. Jensen,et al. Environmental Monitoring at Nydam, a Waterlogged Site with Weapon Sacrifices from the Danish Iron Age. I: A Comparison of Methods Used and Results from Undisturbed Conditions , 2004 .
[4] Chris Park,et al. The Environment , 2010 .
[5] R. Griffin. Re-watering of the Iron Age causeway at Fiskerton, England , 2008 .
[6] James Leslie Cheetham. An assessment of the potential for in situ preservation of buried organic archaeological remains at Sutton Common, South Yorkshire , 2004 .
[7] A. Smit. Guidelines for the non-destructive recording and monitoring of the physical quality of archaeological sites and monuments , 2006 .