In seekers that never resolve targets spatially, it may be adequate to calibrate only with sources that have known aperture irradiance. In modern missile interceptors, the target becomes spatially resolved at close ranges, and the seeker's ability to accurately measure the radiance at different positions in the scene is also important. Thus, it is necessary to calibrate the seekers with extended sources of known radiance. The aperture irradiance is given by the radiance integrated over the angular extent of the target in the scene. Thus radiance calibrations and accurately presenting the targets spatially produces accurate irradiances. The accuracy of the scene radiance is also important in generating synthetic imagery for testing seeker conceptual designs and seeker algorithms, and for hardware-in-the-loop testing with imaging projection systems. The routine procedure at the Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate's AFRL/MNGG is to model and project the detailed spatial and radiometric content of the scenes. Hence, accurate depiction of the radiance in the scene is important. AFRL/MNGG calibrates the complete projection system (synthetic image generator and scene projector) with extended sources of known radiance, not unresolved sources of known irradiance. This paper demonstrates that accurate radiance calibrations and accurate spatial rendering do provide accurate aperture irradiances in the projection systems. In recent tests conducted by AFRL/MNGG, the projection system was calibrated in terms of radiance, and the aperture irradiances were determined both as they were observed in the synthetic images that drove the projection system and in the images of the projection system measured by the unit under test. The aperture irradiances were compared with the known truth data and errors were determined. This paper presents results of analyzing the errors associated with the observed aperture irradiances.
[1]
Dennis R. Crow,et al.
Composite hardbody and missile plume (CHAMP 2001) IR scene generation program
,
2001,
SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.
[2]
David S. Flynn,et al.
Formalism for analyzing spatial, spectral, and temporal effects in a hardware-in-the-loop system involving a pixelized projector and a passive imaging sensor
,
1996,
Defense, Security, and Sensing.
[3]
Charles F. Coker,et al.
Prefiltering synthetic images for projection in hardware-in-the-loop systems
,
1997,
Defense, Security, and Sensing.
[4]
неоднозначно читаемым,et al.
在雙眼視覺中利用類神經網路預測3-D 運動軌跡
,
1997
.
[5]
Jason S. Coker,et al.
Demonstration of innovative techniques used for real-time closed-loop infrared scene generation
,
1998,
Defense, Security, and Sensing.
[6]
George C. Goldsmith,et al.
Numerical quantization effects in KHILS projection systems
,
2002,
SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.
[7]
Robert Lee Murrer,et al.
Development of a two-color projection system for the KHILS Vacuum Cold Chamber (KVACC)
,
2000,
Defense, Security, and Sensing.
[8]
Thomas P. Bergin,et al.
Radiometric calibration procedures for a wideband infrared scene projector (WISP)
,
1999,
Defense, Security, and Sensing.
[9]
Charles F. Coker,et al.
Analysis of errors associated with measurement of projector nonuniformity
,
1995,
Defense, Security, and Sensing.
[10]
George C. Goldsmith,et al.
Setting the PACE in IRSP: a reconfigurable PC-based array-control electronics system for infrared scene projection
,
2003,
SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.
[11]
Breck A. Sieglinger,et al.
Radiometrically calibrating spectrally coupled two-color projectors
,
2003,
SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.