Temporal suppression of the click-evoked otoacoustic emission level-curve.

The click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) level-curve grows linearly for clicks below 40-60 dB and saturates for higher inputs. This study investigates dynamic (i.e., time-dependent) features of the CEOAE level-curve by presenting a suppressor-click less than 8 ms before the test-click. An alteration of the CEOAE level-curve, designated here as temporal suppression, was observed within this time period, and was shown to depend on the levels and the temporal separation of the two clicks. Temporal suppression occurred for all four subjects tested, and resulted in a vertical offset from the unsuppressed level-curve for test-click levels greater than 50 dB peak-equivalent level (peSPL). Temporal suppression was greatest for suppressors presented 1-4 ms before the test click, and the magnitude and time scale of the effect were subject dependent. Temporal suppression was furthermore observed for the short- (i.e., 6-18 ms) and long-latency (i.e., 24-36 ms) regions of the CEOAE, indicating that temporal suppression similarly affects synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs) and purely evoked CEOAE components. Overall, this study demonstrates that temporal suppression of the CEOAE level-curve reflects a dynamic process in human cochlear processing that works on a time scale of 0-10 ms.

[1]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears , 1986, Hearing Research.

[2]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  C. Shera,et al.  Intensity-invariance of fine time structure in basilar-membrane click responses: implications for cochlear mechanics. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  L. Schulte,et al.  Basic characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants and children. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Roger D. Thornton,et al.  Temporal nonlinearity revealed by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded to trains of multiple clicks , 2002, Hearing Research.

[7]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Characterizing and modeling dynamic processes in the cochlea using otoacoustic emissions , 2010 .

[8]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus , 1980, Hearing Research.

[9]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  Transducer hysteresis contributes to "stimulus artifact" in the measurement of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (L). , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Mark E Lutman,et al.  Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data , 2000, Hearing Research.

[11]  John J. Guinan,et al.  Mechanisms of Mammalian Otoacoustic Emission , 2008 .

[12]  R. J. Ritsma,et al.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human ear , 1979 .

[13]  D. Kemp.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Z Kevanishvili,et al.  Effects of the conditioning click on click-evoked otoacoustic emission. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  J. Guinan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Walt Jesteadt,et al.  High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  P. van Dijk,et al.  The occurrence of click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions ("Kemp echoes") in normal-hearing ears. , 1987, Scandinavian audiology.

[19]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar membrane responses to broadband stimuli. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Mark E Lutman,et al.  Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Assumed model and polarity-symmetry , 2000, Hearing Research.

[22]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Temporal suppression and augmentation of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 2008, Hearing Research.

[23]  Paul Avan,et al.  Effect of click intensity on click-evoked otoacoustic emission waveforms: implications for the origin of emissions , 2003, Hearing Research.

[24]  John J Guinan,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of auditory-nerve-fiber and basilar-membrane click responses reveal glide irregularities and non-characteristic-frequency skirts. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  G A Tavartkiladze,et al.  Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission. , 1994, British journal of audiology.

[26]  Robert H Withnell,et al.  Reconciling the origin of the transient evoked ototacoustic emission in humans. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  L. Collet,et al.  Effect of interstimulus interval on evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1995, Hearing Research.

[28]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions , 1980, Hearing Research.

[29]  Stephen J. Elliott,et al.  Dynamic nonlinear cochlear model predictions of click-evoked otoacoustic emission suppression , 2005, Hearing Research.

[30]  B A Prieve,et al.  COAEs and SSOAEs in Adults with Increased Age , 1995, Ear and hearing.