Bionics and green technology in maritime shipping: an assessment of the effect of Salvinia air-layer hull coatings for drag and fuel reduction

To save energy and reduce environmental impacts, new technologies towards a development of a sustainable ‘greener’ economy are needed. The main opportunity to improve sustainability by reducing emissions is within the transport sector. More than 90% of all goods worldwide are transported by ships. Particularly maritime ships using heavy fuel oil and marine gas oil play a major role. The total fuel consumption of shipping in 2016 was about 250 m t (domestic ca. 50 m t, international shipping ca. 200 m t). The vast portion of the energy consumption of a ship is the need to overcome the drag between ship hull and water—depending on the shape of the vessel and its size up to 90% of total fuel consumption. This means reducing drag helps to save fuel and reduces carbon emissions as well as pollution considerably. Different techniques for drag reduction are known, e.g. the micro-bubble technique or the bulbous bow. We investigated a novel bioinspired technique since 2002: the application of biomimetic surfaces with long-term stable air layers on ship hulls, serving as a slip agent. This technology is based on the Salvinia Effect, allowing a permanent stabilization of air layers under water. In this case study, we analysed the possible savings, which also could be combined with modified micro-bubble technologies. We calculated, based on a selection of five ship types, representing 75% of the world fleet, that air-layer hull coatings could lead to estimated savings of 32.5 million tons of fuel (meaning 13.0% of the worldwide shipping fuel consumption), equal to 18.5 billion US$ and 130.0 million tons of CO2e per year. The positive impacts on global temperature and other greenhouse gases are calculated and could be a contributing factor in accomplishing the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. The study is a contribution to enhance our patchy knowledge concerning the potential economic and ecological benefit of bionics and biomimetic technologies. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bioinspired materials and surfaces for green science and technology’.

[1]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2016 , 2016 .

[2]  E. Yuliwati,et al.  A Review , 2019, Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes.

[3]  D. Victor,et al.  Climate Extremes and Global Health , 2018 .

[4]  A. Wijkman,et al.  Come On!: Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet , 2018 .

[5]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Plant Surfaces: Structures and Functions for Biomimetic Innovations , 2017, Nano-Micro Letters.

[6]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Superhydrophobic hierarchically structured surfaces in biology: evolution, structural principles and biomimetic applications , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Bionics and Biodiversity – Bio-inspired Technical Innovation for a Sustainable Future , 2016 .

[8]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[9]  P. Zamparo,et al.  Passive Drag Reduction Using Full-Body Swimsuits: The Role of Body Position , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[10]  B. N. Jagdish,et al.  Experimental Study of Air Layer Sustainability for Frictional Drag Reduction , 2014 .

[11]  Jennifer L. Martin,et al.  Fouling around: vessel sea-chests as a vector for the introduction and spread of aquatic invasive species , 2014 .

[12]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Biofouling: lessons from nature , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Martin Kagerbauer,et al.  Auto-Mobilität: Fahrleistungen steigen 2011 weiter , 2012 .

[14]  R. Hughes,et al.  Drag reduction by air release promotes fast ascent in jumping emperor penguins—a novel hypothesis , 2011 .

[15]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Dry under water: Comparative morphology and functional aspects of air‐retaining insect surfaces , 2011, Journal of morphology.

[16]  Erik S. Schneider,et al.  Superhydrophobic surfaces of the water bug Notonecta glauca: a model for friction reduction and air retention , 2011, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[17]  Gui Lohmann,et al.  Contribution on tourism and green economy in South America to the UNEP Towards a Green Economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication report , 2011 .

[18]  Erin H. Green,et al.  Energy and GHG Emissions Savings Analysis of Fluoropolymer Foul Release Hull Coating , 2011 .

[19]  James J. Corbett,et al.  An assessment of technologies for reducing regional short-lived climate forcers emitted by ships with implications for Arctic shipping , 2010 .

[20]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Thomas Schimmel,et al.  The Salvinia Paradox: Superhydrophobic Surfaces with Hydrophilic Pins for Air Retention Under Water , 2010, Advanced materials.

[22]  F Fleischer,et al.  Physical properties, chemical composition, and cloud forming potential of particulate emissions from a marine diesel engine at various load conditions. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  R. Asariotis,et al.  Review of Maritime Transport, 2014 , 2010 .

[24]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Hierarchically sculptured plant surfaces and superhydrophobicity. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[25]  H. Damon Matthews,et al.  The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions , 2009, Nature.

[26]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne , 2009, Nature.

[27]  David R. Cocker,et al.  In-use gaseous and particulate matter emissions from a modern ocean going container vessel , 2008 .

[28]  A. R. Ravishankara,et al.  Light absorbing carbon emissions from commercial shipping , 2008 .

[29]  R. Baumann,et al.  Experimental studies on particle emissions from cruising ship, their characteristic properties, transformation and atmospheric lifetime in the marine boundary layer , 2008 .

[30]  M. Schultz Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering , 2007, Biofouling.

[31]  B. Slack,et al.  The Geography of Transport Systems , 2006 .

[32]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Super-hydrophobicity fundamentals: implications to biofouling prevention , 2006, Biofouling.

[33]  Lynn M. Cooper,et al.  Come on in , 2005 .

[34]  J. Corbett,et al.  Updated emissions from ocean shipping , 2003 .

[35]  S. Gollasch,et al.  The Importance of Ship Hull Fouling as a Vector of Species Introductions into the North Sea , 2002 .

[36]  Francis Noblesse,et al.  Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms , 2001 .

[37]  Robert Latorre Ship hull drag reduction using bottom air injection , 1997 .

[38]  D. Mant Prevention , 1994, The Lancet.

[39]  B Russell,et al.  Lessons from nature. , 1993, Nursing.

[40]  Martin Stopford,et al.  Maritime Economics 3e , 1988 .

[41]  A M Kracht,et al.  DESIGN OF BULBOUS BOWS , 1978 .