Evaluating sustainable transport strategies for the counties of Taiwan based on their degree of urbanization

The purpose of this study was to evaluate sustainable transport strategies for the 23 counties of Taiwan. The 23 counties were grouped into four clusters based on their degree of urbanization. Subsequently, a hybrid approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) was used to deal with incomplete information in prioritizing the strategies. The results showed that the focuses of decision makers in each county were different. For the counties in Cluster 1 (highly urbanized counties), the three top-ranked strategies were: improving the accessibility of non-motorized modes, improving Demand Response Transportation System (DRTS) services, and improving accessibility for elderly and handicapped persons. For the counties in Cluster 2 (rapidly developing counties), and Cluster 3 (developing counties with distinct urban and rural patterns), the three top-ranked strategies were: improving transit services, improving the accessibility of non-motorized modes, and improving DRTS services. For the counties in Cluster 4 (under developed counties), the focuses of decision makers were significantly different from the focuses of decision makers in other counties. The three top-ranked strategies were: promoting the use of electric motorcycles, improving DRTS services, and improving the accessibility of non-motorized modes. The analytical results of this study justified the application of the principle: tailor measures to suit local circumstances.

[1]  Christopher M. Weible,et al.  Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis , 2008 .

[2]  Yanbing Ju,et al.  Emergency alternative evaluation under group decision makers: A method of incorporating DS/AHP with extended TOPSIS , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Tzay-An Shiau,et al.  Developing an indicator system for local governments to evaluate transport sustainability strategies , 2013 .

[4]  G. Tzeng,et al.  Energy conservation strategies in urban transportation: application of multiple criteria decision-making , 1987 .

[5]  Ram M. Shrestha,et al.  MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH FOR THE SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SYSTEM IN DELHI , 2003 .

[6]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Ying Wu,et al.  A new linguistic MCDM method based on multiple-criterion data fusion , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[9]  N. Pal,et al.  QUANTIFICATION OF CONFLICT IN DEMPSTER-SHAFER FRAMEWORK: A NEW APPROACH , 1996 .

[10]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[11]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[12]  Tzay-An Shiau,et al.  Evaluating sustainable transport strategies with incomplete information for Taipei City , 2012 .

[13]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  A Generalization of Bayesian Inference , 1968, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[14]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[15]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[16]  Bernadette O’Regan,et al.  Use of ecological footprinting to explore alternative transport policy scenarios in an Irish city-region , 2008 .