Analysis of short-period regional phase path effects associated with topography in Eurasia

Propagation of regional seismic phases is highly dependent on path effects, but we have a limited understanding of these effects and no general procedure for accounting for path variation influence on regional waveforms. Thus, there is strong regional variability in the effectiveness of regional wave discriminants used to identify small earthquakes and nuclear explosions. Motivated by many observations of correlation between surface geology and regional phase behavior, we empirically explore the relationship between short-period regional and upper mantle distance signal energy and statistics of topography along different travel paths using data for underground nuclear explosions at Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan. We find strong linear correlations of the logarithmic rms amplitude ratio Sn / Lg (and to a lesser extent, P/Lg ) with mean altitude, rms roughness, rms slope, and skewness of topography along the paths to receivers in Eurasia. This indicates that energy partitioning in the regional wave field is controlled by wave-guide structure and attenuation variations that are manifested in surface topography. This suggests that it is feasible in many cases to directly calibrate regional discriminants for path effects in terms of observable surface topography, as a surrogate for overall path properties. The relationships also help to understand the nature of regional phase propagation.

[1]  Douglas R. Baumgardt,et al.  Regional seismic waveform discriminants and case-based event identification using regional arrays , 1990 .

[2]  Maurice Ewing,et al.  Two slow surface waves across North America , 1952 .

[3]  L. Zonenshain,et al.  Geology of the USSR : a plate-tectonic synthesis , 1990 .

[4]  Robert R. Blandford,et al.  Seismic event discrimination , 1982 .

[5]  T. J. Bennett,et al.  Analysis of seismic discrimination capabilities using regional data from western United States events , 1986 .

[6]  B. Kennett On regional S , 1985 .

[7]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[8]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Regional discrimination between NTS explosions and western U.S. earthquakes , 1989 .

[9]  P. Molnar,et al.  Lateral variations of attenuation in the upper mantle and discontinuities in the lithosphere , 1969 .

[10]  B. Kennett,et al.  The effect of 3-D structure on Lg propagation patterns , 1990 .

[11]  B. Kennett,et al.  Mapping of crustal heterogeneity in the North Sea basin via the propagation of Lg-waves , 1985 .

[12]  B. Kennett On the nature of regional seismic phases-I. Phase representations for Pn, Pg, Sn, Lg , 1989 .

[13]  S. Gregersen Lg-wave propagation and crustal structure differences near Denmark and the North Sea , 1984 .

[14]  P. Hall Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering , 1989 .

[15]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  The stability of rms Lg measurements and their potential for accurate estimation of the yields of Soviet underground nuclear explosions , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  G. Stewart Optical Waveguide Theory , 1983, Handbook of Laser Technology and Applications.

[17]  M. Bouchon,et al.  Attenuation of crustal waves across the Alpine Range , 1993 .

[18]  T. Lay,et al.  Effects of crustal structure under the Barents and Kara Seas on short-period regional wave propagation for Novaya Zemlya explosions: Empirical relations , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[19]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  Regionalization of crustal coda Q in the continental United States , 1983 .

[20]  J. Oliver,et al.  Lateral variations of high-frequency seismic wave propagation at regional distances across the Turkish and Iranian plateaus , 1981 .

[21]  R. A. Wagner,et al.  A comparison of regional phases from underground nuclear explosions at east Kazakh and Nevada test sites , 1992 .

[22]  J. R. Murphy,et al.  Demonstration of regional discrimination of Eurasian seismic events using observations at Soviet IRIS and CDSN stations. Final report, 29 Mar 89-28 Mar 92 , 1992 .

[23]  O. Nuttli,et al.  Lg magnitudes of selected East Kazakhstan underground explosions , 1986 .

[24]  D. Helmberger,et al.  Preliminary observations from the use of US-Soviet Joint Seismic Program data to model upper mantle triplications beneath Asia , 1993 .

[25]  M. Campillo Lg WAVE PROPAGATION IN A LATERALLY VARYING CRUST AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE APPARENT QUALITY FACTOR IN CENTRAL FRANCE , 1987 .

[26]  P. Molnar,et al.  Propagation of Lg and lateral variations in crustal structure in Asia , 1977 .

[27]  B. Mitchell,et al.  A Back-Projection Method For Imaging Large-Scale Lateral Variations of Lg Coda Q With Application to Continental Africa , 1990 .

[28]  Frode Ringdal,et al.  Seismic yield determination of Soviet underground nuclear explosions at the Shagan River test site , 1992 .

[29]  Douglas R. Baumgardt,et al.  Investigation of teleseismic Lg blockage and scattering using regional arrays , 1990 .