Computer Vision - ACCV 2014 Workshops

The key problems in visual object classification are: learning discriminative feature to distinguish between two or more visually similar categories (e.g. dogs and cats), modeling the variation of visual appearance within instances of the same class (e.g. Dalmatian and Chihuahua in the same category of dogs), and tolerate imaging distortion (3D pose). These account to within and between class variance in machine learning terminology, but in recent works these additional pieces of information, latent dependency, have been shown to be beneficial for the learning process. Latent attribute space was recently proposed and verified to capture the latent dependent correlation between classes. Attributes can be annotated manually, but more attempting is to extract them in an unsupervised manner. Clustering is one of the popular unsupervised approaches, and the recent literature introduces similarity measures that help to discover visual attributes by clustering. However, the latent attribute structure in real life is multi-relational, e.g. two different sport cars in different poses vs. a sport car and a family car in the same pose what attribute can dominate similarity? Instead of clustering, a network (graph) containing multiple connections is a natural way to represent such multi-relational attributes between images. In the light of this, we introduce an unsupervised framework for network construction based on pairwise visual similarities and experimentally demonstrate that the constructed network can be used to automatically discover multiple discrete (e.g. sub-classes) and continuous (pose change) latent attributes. Illustrative examples with publicly benchmarking datasets can verify the effectiveness of capturing multirelation between images in the unsupervised style by our proposed network.

[1]  S. Süsstrunk,et al.  SLIC Superpixels ? , 2010 .

[2]  Jason Weston,et al.  Fast Kernel Classifiers with Online and Active Learning , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  Yulian Zhu,et al.  Semi-random subspace method for face recognition , 2009, Image Vis. Comput..

[4]  Yanning Zhang,et al.  Part-Based Visual Tracking with Online Latent Structural Learning , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Structured Visual Tracking with Dynamic Graph , 2012, ACCV.

[6]  Chengjun Liu,et al.  Evolutionary Pursuit and Its Application to Face Recognition , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[8]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  A Probabilistic Framework for Multitarget Tracking with Mutual Occlusions , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Jun Guo,et al.  Extended SRC: Undersampled Face Recognition via Intraclass Variant Dictionary , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  Robust Fragments-based Tracking using the Integral Histogram , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[11]  Junseok Kwon,et al.  Tracking of a non-rigid object via patch-based dynamic appearance modeling and adaptive Basin Hopping Monte Carlo sampling , 2009, CVPR.

[12]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Online Spatio-temporal Structural Context Learning for Visual Tracking , 2012, ECCV.

[13]  Shai Avidan,et al.  Locally Orderless Tracking , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Yu-Shen Liu,et al.  Three dimensional shape comparison of flexible proteins using the local-diameter descriptor , 2009, BMC Structural Biology.

[15]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Robust Visual Tracking using 1 Minimization , 2009 .

[16]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Online Multiple Instance Joint Model for Visual Tracking , 2012, 2012 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance.

[17]  Karim Faez,et al.  Face Recognition System Using Ant Colony Optimization-Based Selected Features , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Security and Defense Applications.

[18]  Huchuan Lu,et al.  Superpixel tracking , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[19]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  MCMC-based particle filtering for tracking a variable number of interacting targets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Junseok Kwon,et al.  Visual tracking decomposition , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[21]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Visual tracking with histograms and articulating blocks , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  Afshin Dehghan,et al.  Part-based multiple-person tracking with partial occlusion handling , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[23]  Huchuan Lu,et al.  Robust object tracking via sparsity-based collaborative model , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[24]  Harry Wechsler,et al.  The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[25]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Hough-based tracking of non-rigid objects , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[26]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[27]  Thomas A. Funkhouser,et al.  A benchmark for 3D mesh segmentation , 2009, ACM Trans. Graph..

[28]  K. Manikantan,et al.  Face recognition using spectrum-based feature extraction , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[29]  Huchuan Lu,et al.  Visual tracking via adaptive structural local sparse appearance model , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[30]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[31]  Dong Yi,et al.  Robust Online Learned Spatio-Temporal Context Model for Visual Tracking , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[32]  Ales Leonardis,et al.  An adaptive coupled-layer visual model for robust visual tracking , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[33]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[34]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Feature Subset Selection , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[35]  Jiri Matas,et al.  P-N learning: Bootstrapping binary classifiers by structural constraints , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[36]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Incremental Learning for Visual Tracking , 2004, NIPS.

[37]  Ayellet Tal,et al.  Metamorphosis of Polyhedral Surfaces using Decomposition , 2002, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[38]  Rabab M. Ramadan,et al.  FACE RECOGNITION USING PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION-BASED SELECTED FEATURES , 2009 .

[39]  Brijesh Verma,et al.  FACE RECOGNITION: A NEW FEATURE SELECTION AND CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE , 2004 .

[40]  Andries Petrus Engelbrecht,et al.  Fundamentals of Computational Swarm Intelligence , 2005 .

[41]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Visual tracking with online Multiple Instance Learning , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.