Preferences for Deferred Losses

Abstract The question of whether aversive outcomes are generally preferred at sooner or at later times in the future is examined. Theories predicting choices of advanced and deferred aversive outcomes are summarized. A previous result suggesting overwhelming preference for more immediate aversive outcomes is challenged on the basis of problems endemic to experimental studies of decision making. An experiment that attempted to circumvent those problems is described. Subjects chose between sums of money that could be lost at various times in the future. The subjects were evenly divided in their preferences for advanced and deferred losses. Subjects in a control condition duplicated the results of the previous experiment that had demonstrated the predominance of preferences for advanced aversive outcomes. The implications of the conclusions for a representation of choice over deferred outcomes are discussed.

[1]  L. Melikian Preference for Delayed Reinforcement: An Experimental Study among Palestinian Arab Refugee Children , 1959 .

[2]  G. Gurin,et al.  Internal-External Control in the Motivational Dynamics of Negro Youth. , 1969 .

[3]  G. Spivack,et al.  Incentive, time conception and self control in a group of emotionally disturbed boys. , 1959, Journal of clinical psychology.

[4]  I. Fisher,et al.  The theory of interest , 1956 .

[5]  T. Koopmans Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience , 1960 .

[6]  Preference for Delayed Reward as a Function of Age and Personality , 1968, Psychological reports.

[7]  T. Wallsten,et al.  Individual Decision Behavior , 1972 .

[8]  A. K. Basu A Theory of Decision-Making , 1973, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.

[9]  W. Mischel Delay of gratification, need for achievement, and acquiescence in another culture. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[10]  W. Mischel,et al.  Waiting for rewards and punishments: effects of time and probability on choice. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  G M Becker,et al.  Value: behavioral decision theory. , 1967, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  W. Mischel,et al.  Preference for delayed reinforcement and social responsibility. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[13]  K. Renner DELAYED OF REINFORCEMENT: A HISTORICAL REVIEW. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  W. Mischel,et al.  Effects of expected delay time on the subjective value of rewards and punishments. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  W. Edwards Behavioral decision theory. , 1961, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  G. Mandler,et al.  Test anxiety questionnaires. , 1958, Journal of consulting psychology.

[17]  A. Davids Ego functions in disturbed and normal children: aspiration, inhibition, time estimation, and delayed gratification. , 1969, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  W. Mischel Father-absence and delay of gratification: crosscultural comparisons. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.