In situ strength characterisation of peat and organic soil using full-flow penetrometers

Full-flow penetrometers have been shown to overcome problems experienced with the cone penetrometer when measuring resistance in very soft peat and organic soil, and give a much more uniform measure of resistance than the cone in fibrous peat. However, at present there is no guidance on the interpretation of strength parameters in these soils using the T-bar and ball. This paper examines the results of tests using these devices at two research sites in the Netherlands in con- junction with high-quality Sherbrooke sampling for laboratory testing. In fibrous peat, the T-bar and ball provided a more uniform measure of resistance with a lower degree of scatter than the cone. The in situ testing results have been compared with the laboratory tests to assess the range of resistance factors relating penetration resistance to the undrained shear strength (su) and have been shown to occupy a lower range of values than the cone penetrometer. However, penetration tests in these soils are likely to be influenced by partial drainage effects and this should be considered during testing and the sub- sequent interpretation of results. Recommendations are made for the use of full-flow penetrometers to obtain strength pa- rameters in these soils.

[1]  Harold H. Sanguinetti.  HYDROLOGY , 1923 .

[2]  Pe Pheeney,et al.  Geotechnical Classification of Peats and Organic Soils , 1983 .

[3]  Gholamreza Mesri,et al.  Engineering Properties of Fibrous Peats , 2007 .

[4]  Yuxia Hu,et al.  Limiting resistance of a spherical penetrometer in cohesive material , 2000 .

[5]  D. Ngan-Tillard,et al.  Experimental validation of a model relating water content to the electrical conductivity of peat , 2012 .

[6]  J. Klopatek,et al.  Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen and Moor , 1983 .

[7]  M A Viergever.  CONE PENETRATION WITH ENLARGED TIP IN COHESIVE SOILS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, SAN FRANCISCO, 12-16 AUGUST 1985 , 1985 .

[8]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Characterisation of soft sediments for offshore applications , 2004 .

[9]  A. W. Bishop,et al.  A hydraulic triaxial apparatus for controlled stress path testing , 1975 .

[10]  R. Dyvik,et al.  Comparison of truly undrained and constant volume direct simple shear tests , 1987 .

[11]  N. Boylan,et al.  Full-Flow Penetrometer Testing in Bothkennar Clay , 2007 .

[12]  P. M. Jarrett,et al.  Testing of Peats and Organic Soils , 1983 .

[13]  M. Randolph,et al.  Punch-through and liquefaction induced failure of shallow foundations on calcareous sediments , 1994 .

[14]  N. Boylan,et al.  Peat slope failure in Ireland , 2008, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[15]  A. Landva,et al.  Vane testing in peat , 1980 .

[16]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Numerical Analysis of T-bar penetration in soft clay , 2006 .

[17]  Chris M. Martin,et al.  Upper-bound analysis of lateral pile capacity in cohesive soil , 2006 .

[18]  G.A.M. Kruse,et al.  Characterisation and engineering properties of Dutch peats , 2006 .

[19]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  Cone-penetration testing in geotechnical practice , 1997 .

[20]  J. Holden,et al.  Hydrological controls of surficial mass movements in peat , 2004 .

[21]  N. Hobbs.  Mire morphology and the properties and behaviour of some British and foreign peats , 1986, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[22]  Guy Lefebvre,et al.  A new method of sampling in sensitive clay , 1979 .

[23]  G. T. Houlsby,et al.  Analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay , 1991 .

[24]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Strength profiling in soft offshore soils , 1998 .

[25]  Mark Randolph,et al.  A new site investigation tool for the centrifuge , 1991 .

[26]  Paul W. Mayne,et al.  Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization , 2012 .

[27]  M. Randolph,et al.  Comparison of cone and T-bar factors in two onshore and one offshore clay sediments , 2005 .

[28]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  Interpretation of Sensitivity and Remolded Undrained Shear Strength with Full Flow Penetrometers , 2006 .

[29]  W. A. Take,et al.  Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry , 2003 .

[30]  M. Randolph,et al.  Combining upper bound and strain path methods for evaluating penetration resistance , 2005 .

[31]  E. T. Hanrahan.  An Investigation Of Some Physical Properties Of Peat , 1954 .

[32]  M. Randolph,et al.  Improved Seabed Strenght Profiling Using T-Bar Penetrometer , 1998 .

[33]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Effect of penetration rate on penetrometer resistance in clay , 2006 .

[34]  Cee-Ing Teh,et al.  An analytical study of the cone penetration test , 1991 .

[35]  半沢 秀郎,et al.  A CASE STUDY OF THE APPLICATION OF DIRECT SHEAR AND CONE PENETRATION TESTS TO SOIL INVESTIGATION : DESIGN AND QUALITY CONTROL FOR PEATY SOILS , 1994 .

[36]  M. Randolph,et al.  The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil , 1984 .

[37]  H. Wallace,et al.  New Frontiers , 1934 .

[38]  Tom Lunne,et al.  Effects of sample disturbance and consolidation procedures on measured shear strength of soft marine Norwegian clays , 2006 .

[39]  N. Boylan,et al.  Development of a Direct Simple Shear Apparatus for Peat Soils , 2009 .