Exploratoryand confirmatory factoranalysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives

AMY E. HURLEY, TERRI A. SCANDURA, CHESTER A. SCHRIESHEIM, MICHAEL T. BRANNICK, ANSON SEERS, ROBERT J. VANDENBERG AND LARRY J. WILLIAMS Department of Professional Studies, Chapman University, U.S.A. Department of Management, University of Miami, U.S.A. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, U.S.A. Department of Management, Virginia Commonwealth University, U.S.A. Department of Management, The University of Georgia, U.S.A. Department of Management, University of Tennessee, U.S.A.

[1]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Measurement and nonmeasurement processes with negative affectivity and employee attitudes , 1996 .

[2]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling , 1995 .

[3]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Covariance structure modeling in organizational research: Problems with the method versus applications of the method , 1995 .

[4]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Structural equation modelling in perspective. , 1995 .

[5]  E. F. Stone-Romero,et al.  Trends in Research Design and Data Analytic Strategies in Organizational Research , 1995 .

[6]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  A Central Question in Cross-Cultural Research: Do Employees of Different Cultures Interpret Work-related Measures in an Equivalent Manner?: , 1994 .

[7]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .

[8]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  Assessing newcomers' changing commitments to the organization during the first 6 months of work , 1993 .

[9]  Melenie J. Lankau,et al.  Improving Construct Measurement In Management Research: Comments and a Quantitative Approach for Assessing the Theoretical Content Adequacy of Paper-and-Pencil Survey-Type Instruments , 1993 .

[10]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Analysis of the multitrait^multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis , 1992 .

[12]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Estimation Problems in the Block-Diagonal Model of the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix , 1990 .

[13]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? , 1989 .

[14]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[15]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[16]  S. Mulaik.  Toward a Conception of Causality Applicable to Experimentation and Causal Modeling. , 1987 .

[17]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[18]  R. Wherry.  Underprediction from Overfitting: 45 years of Shrinkage. , 1975 .

[19]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1965 .

[20]  C. Spearman.  General intelligence Objectively Determined and Measured , 1904 .

[21]  Karl Pearson F.R.S..  LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[22]  D. Gerbing,et al.  Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis , 1996 .

[23]  L. J. Williams,et al.  Investigating measurement and non-measurement processes with method effect variables: An example with negative affectivity and employee attitudes , 1996 .

[24]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Parsimony‐based fit indices for multiple‐indicator models: Do they work? , 1994 .

[25]  W F Velicer,et al.  Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.