What makes human resource information successful? Managers' perceptions of attributes for successful human resource information

Human resource information (HRI) is information such as head count, fluctuation, age distributions or results from employee surveys which is available to an organization. Despite being a high-priority issue for practitioners and researchers, this topic remains far from reaching a level at which the users of HRI – mostly managers and senior executives – are satisfied and perceive HRI as effective and useful for decision making. This is due to a knowledge gap regarding which relevant attributes HRI needs to possess. In order to fill this gap, we built on theoretical arguments from the information systems literature and integrated them into an HRI success model with the key variables ease of use, information quality, perceived usefulness, user information satisfaction and information use. This model was tested among 179 managers in Swiss banks, and structural equation modeling provided clear support for it. In particular, information quality was a key determining factor for both user information satisfaction and information use, and there was a weak link between user information satisfaction and actual HRI use. Both academics and practitioners might benefit from this model by achieving a deeper understanding of the key factors and interdependencies leading to successful HRI.

[1]  M. Veldhoven,et al.  Attitude towards E‐HRM: an empirical study at Philips , 2007 .

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[4]  David H. Olsen,et al.  Determinants of professionally autonomous end user acceptance in an enterprise resource planning system environment , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[5]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  A study of personal computer utilization by managers , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Victor Y. Haines,et al.  Information technology usage and human resource roles and effectiveness , 2008 .

[7]  R. Hoyle The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. , 1995 .

[8]  H. Bierman,et al.  Quantitative analysis for business decisions , 1969 .

[9]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  David S. Weiss,et al.  HR metrics that count: aligning human capital management to business results , 2005 .

[12]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Bryan Dawson,et al.  Method Effects, Measurement Error, and Substantive Conclusions , 2010 .

[15]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  Sandra L. Fisher,et al.  Beyond user acceptance: An examination of employee reactions to information technology systems , 2004 .

[17]  James Wallace,et al.  The use and impact of human resource information systems on human resource management professionals , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Jac Fitz-enz The ROI of Human Capital: Measuring the Economic Value of Employee Performance , 2000 .

[20]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  Beyond HR: The New Science of Human Capital , 2007 .

[21]  Piotr Soja,et al.  Understanding determinants of enterprise system adoption success: lessons learned from full-scope projects in manufacturing companies , 2010 .

[22]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Wendi Bukowitz,et al.  Human Capital Measurement , 2004 .

[24]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Barbara Janta,et al.  Why Is It So Hard to Apply Professional Selection Methods in Business Practice? , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[26]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[27]  Paul E. Spector Method Variance in Organizational Research , 2006 .

[28]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[30]  Rahat H. Bokhari,et al.  The relationship between system usage and user satisfaction: a meta-analysis , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[31]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  SINGLE‐ATTRIBUTE UTILITY ANALYSIS MAY BE FUTILE, BUT THIS CAN’T BE THE END OF THE STORY: CAUSAL CHAIN ANALYSIS AS AN ALTERNATIVE , 2010 .

[33]  Alice Yee Mark,et al.  Achieving Strategic Excellence: An Assessment of Human Resource Organizations , 2006 .

[34]  Michael D. Coovert,et al.  Guest editors' note: Turbulent waters: The intersection of information technology and human resources , 2004 .

[35]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[36]  How HR measures support risk management: The Deutsche bank example , 2002 .

[37]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[38]  Simha R. Magal A Model for Evaluating Information Center Success , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Veni, Vidi, Vici: Breaking the TAM Logjam , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Determinants of EIS use: Testing a behavioral model, , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[41]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Keys to Executive Information Systems Success , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  David Ulrich,et al.  Talent: Making People Your Competitive Advantage , 2008 .

[43]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Investing in People: Financial Impact of Human Resource Initiatives , 2008 .

[44]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Short Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment , 1997 .

[47]  Stefan Strohmeier,et al.  Research in e-HRM: Review and implications , 2007 .

[48]  Victor Y. Haines,et al.  Conditions for successful human resource information systems , 1997 .

[49]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Single-Item Reliability: A Replication and Extension , 2001 .

[50]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  Strategic Industrial and Organizational Psychology and the Role of Utility Analysis Models , 2003 .

[51]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[52]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  M. Bazerman Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[54]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[55]  M. Browne,et al.  Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[56]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  An Exploration of the Expertness of Outside Informants , 1993 .

[57]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips Standards for Internet-based experimenting. , 2002, Experimental psychology.