Statistical comparison of mass spectra for identification of amphetamine-type stimulants.

A method for the statistical comparison of mass spectral data is demonstrated for applications in controlled substance analysis. The method uses an unequal variance t-test at each mass-to-charge ratio in the scan range to determine if two spectra are statistically associated or discriminated. If the two spectra are associated, a random-match probability is calculated to estimate the likelihood that the mass spectral fragmentation pattern in question occurs by random chance alone. If the two spectra are discriminated, the fragment ions responsible for the discrimination are determined. In this work, mass spectral data from case samples containing amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), phentermine, and psilocin were investigated. All spectra were collected in an accredited forensic laboratory using routine methods for controlled substance analysis. Using the statistical method, spectra of case samples were statistically associated to the corresponding reference standard at the 99.9% confidence level. In these instances, random-match probabilities ranged from 10-39 to 10-29, indicating the probability that the characteristic fragmentation pattern occurred by random chance is extremely small. Further, spectra of case samples were discriminated from other reference standards at the 99.9% or 99.0% confidence level, with 1-26 ions responsible for discrimination in each comparison.

[1]  Colin Aitken,et al.  Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data , 2004 .

[2]  Gareth P Campbell,et al.  The interpretation of elemental composition measurements from forensic glass evidence III. , 1997, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[3]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[4]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[5]  K. Biemann,et al.  Identification of mass spectra by computer-searching a file of known spectra , 1971 .

[6]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Controlling Error in Multiple Comparisons, with Examples from State-to-State Differences in Educational Achievement , 1999 .

[7]  John Buckleton,et al.  A practical example of the interpretation of glass evidence , 1996 .

[8]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[9]  Victoria L McGuffin,et al.  Statistical approach to establish equivalence of unabbreviated mass spectra. , 2014, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[10]  R. Koons,et al.  Interpretation of glass composition measurements: the effects of match criteria on discrimination capability. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  The interpretation of glass evidence. A practical approach , 1990 .

[12]  James M. Curran,et al.  Commentary onKoons, RD, Buscaglia J. The Forensic Significance of Glass Composition and Refractive Index Measurements. J Forensic Sci 1999;44(3):496–503 , 1999 .

[13]  Fred W. McLafferty,et al.  Probability based matching of mass spectra. Rapid identification of specific compounds in mixtures , 1974 .

[14]  R. Smith,et al.  Understanding Mass Spectra: A Basic Approach , 1998 .

[15]  J. D. Morrison,et al.  Computer methods in analytical mass spectrometry. Identification of an unknown compound in a catalog , 1968 .

[16]  P. J. Todd,et al.  Mass Spectrometry: A Textbook , 2007 .

[17]  Law. Policy.  Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .

[18]  F Taroni,et al.  Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: Should we abandon p-value in forensic science applications? , 2016, Forensic science international.

[19]  S. Stein.  An integrated method for spectrum extraction and compound identification from gas chromatography/mass spectrometry data , 1999 .

[20]  Imhoi Koo,et al.  Comparative analysis of mass spectral matching-based compound identification in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  Bernard Robertson,et al.  DNA evidence: Wrong answers or wrong questions? , 2005, Genetica.

[22]  D. Scott,et al.  Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[23]  R. Koons,et al.  The Forensic Significance of Glass Composition and Refractive Index Measurements , 1999 .

[24]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evaluating reproducibility and similarity of mass and intensity data in complex spectra—applications to tubulin , 2008, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.