Image Processing in Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a medical imaging modality used to reveal the shape of vessels for diagnosis and therapeutic purposes. This technique receives much attention because it is non-invasive and provides three-dimensional (3D) data sets as opposed to the planar or two-dimensional (2D) projections of conventional x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA) [1-7]. Like DSA, contrast-enhanced MRA (CE MRA) uses contrast agents to enhance the vascular lumen. The term post-processing refers to a vast number of image manipulation techniques that facilitate the assessment of arterial and venous structures at an independent console. It refers to all operations from data transfer and image visualization to automatic quantification of vessel lesions. For accurate image interpretation, knowledge of the available image processing tools is mandatory. A varietyof reformatting techniques are now available, and it is advantageous to be well versed in as many of these as possible. Each technique has its own strengths and weaknesses, which can lead to pitfalls and artifacts in inexperienced hands. The main challenges for MRA image processing include proper visualization of vessel lumen, optimized thresholding of vessel-to-background image contrast, and arterial-venous separation. The most widely available methods for post-processing MRA data sets are multiplanar reformatting (MPR), maximum-intensity projection (MIP), subvolume MIP, surface-rendering (SR), volumerendering (VR) and virtual intraluminal endoscopy (VIE). This article will focus on the three main areas of the MRA post-processing systems: data handling, image visualization and vascular analysis (Fig. 1).

[1]  Guido Gerig,et al.  3D Multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medical images , 1997, CVRMed.

[2]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Statistical 3D Vessel Segmentation Using a Rician Distribution , 1999, MICCAI.

[3]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis. , 1996, Stroke.

[5]  R.W. Dutton,et al.  Improving geometric model construction for blood flow modeling , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[6]  W. Mali,et al.  Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  I E Magnin,et al.  Improved vessel visualization in MR angiography by nonlinear anisotropic filtering , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  K D Hopper,et al.  Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Yoshitaka Masutani,et al.  Vascular Shape Segmentation and Structure Extraction Using a Shape-Based Region-Growing Model , 1998, MICCAI.

[10]  S C Horii Primer on computers and information technology. Part four: A nontechnical introduction to DICOM. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  W. J. Niessen,et al.  Fast Quantification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms from CTA Volumes , 1998, MICCAI.

[12]  R. Vanninen,et al.  How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? , 1996, Neuroradiology.

[13]  N Alperin,et al.  Improved phase-contrast flow quantification by three-dimensional vessel localization. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  R. Edelman,et al.  Clinical Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1993 .

[15]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  David A. Clunie,et al.  DICOM Structured Reporting , 2000 .

[17]  J. Debatin,et al.  Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis , 2001, The Lancet.

[18]  J. Sequeira,et al.  Automatic reconstruction of irregular tubular structures using generalized cylinders , 1996 .

[19]  William E. Higgins,et al.  Adaptive axes-generation algorithm for 3D tubular structures , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[20]  N M Rofsky,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: artifacts and pitfalls. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  P. Douek,et al.  [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification]. , 2000, Journal des maladies vasculaires.

[22]  Isabelle E. Magnin,et al.  A Deformable Vessel Model with Single Point Initialization for Segmentation, Quantification and Visualization of Blood Vessels in 3D MRA , 2000, MICCAI.

[23]  C Barbier,et al.  [Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography]. , 2001, Journal de radiologie.

[24]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Segmentation of Cerebral Vessels and Aneurysms from MR Angiography Data , 1997, IPMI.

[25]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Multi-scale line segmentation with automatic estimation of width, contrast and tangential direction in 2D and 3D medical images , 1997, CVRMed.

[26]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image processing , 1971 .

[27]  D Revel,et al.  Coronary arteries: new design for three-dimensional arterial phantoms. , 1994, Radiology.

[28]  M. Schmidt,et al.  Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  CVRMed-MRCAS'97 , 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[30]  W. Lam,et al.  Variability of magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography in grading middle cerebral artery stenosis. , 1996, Stroke.

[31]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  On active contour models and balloons , 1991, CVGIP Image Underst..

[32]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Accurate segmentation of blood vessels from 3D medical images , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[33]  Isabelle E. Magnin,et al.  Advances of blood vessel morphology analysis in 3D magnetic resonance images , 2000 .

[34]  E. Fishman,et al.  Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[35]  D N Levin,et al.  Visualization of MR angiographic data with segmentation and volume‐rendering techniques , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Model-based quantitation of 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  D Saloner,et al.  Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.