The Use of the Restricted Partition Method with Case-Control Data

Background/Aims: Many diseases important to public health are not due solely to a single mutation or environmental insult. Instead, complex interactions among multiple genes and environmental exposures likely play crucial roles in the etiology of diverse phenotypes from schizophrenia to chemotherapy response. The Restricted Partition Method (RPM) was designed to detect qualitative genetic and environmental factors contributing to a quantitative trait, even if the contribution is predominantly presented as an interaction (displaying little or no signal in univariate analyses). Although the RPM was developed with the expectation that trait values would be drawn from normal distributions, the algorithm will function if the quantitative trait values are replaced with 0’s or 1’s indicating control or case status. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of the RPM on case-control data. Methods: Case-control data simulated for this study and data provided to the Pharmcogenetics Research Network Analysis Workshop 2005 were used to assess power and type I error for the RPM in this setting. Results: For the tested data, the RPM displayed good power and type I error very close to nominal rates. Conclusions: The RPM is an appropriate method for the analysis of case-control data.

[1]  C. Sing,et al.  A combinatorial partitioning method to identify multilocus genotypic partitions that predict quantitative trait variation. , 2001, Genome research.

[2]  C. Sing,et al.  Heterogeneity of sickle-cell anemia based on a profile of hematological variables. , 1983, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  R. DeSalle,et al.  The molecular through ecological genetics of abnormal abdomen. III. Tissue-specific differential replication of ribosomal genes modulates the abnormal abdomen phenotype in Drosophila mercatorum. , 1986, Genetics.

[4]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. , 1987, Annals of human genetics.

[5]  William Shannon,et al.  Detecting epistatic interactions contributing to quantitative traits , 2004, Genetic epidemiology.

[6]  J. H. Moore,et al.  Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  S. Fisher,et al.  Dissection of epistasis in oligogenic Bardet–Biedl syndrome , 2006, Nature.

[8]  N. Schork,et al.  Who's afraid of epistasis? , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[9]  G. Zubenko,et al.  D10S1423 identifies a susceptibility locus for Alzheimer's disease in a prospective, longitudinal, double-blind study of asymptomatic individuals , 2001, Molecular Psychiatry.

[10]  C. Sing,et al.  Role of the apolipoprotein E polymorphism in determining normal plasma lipid and lipoprotein variation. , 1985, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  M. El-Hazmi,et al.  DNA polymorphism in the beta-globin gene cluster in Saudi Arabs: relation to severity of sickle cell anaemia. , 1992, Acta haematologica.

[12]  Z B Zeng,et al.  Genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting life span in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Genetics.

[13]  A. Templeton,et al.  The molecular through ecological genetics of abnormal abdomen in Drosophila mercatorum. VI. The non-neutrality of the Y chromosome rDNA polymorphism. , 1994, Genetics.

[14]  R. DeSalle,et al.  The molecular through ecological genetics of abnormal abdomen. IV. Components of genetic variation in a natural population of Drosophila mercatorum. , 1992, Genetics.

[15]  T. Reich,et al.  A perspective on epistasis: limits of models displaying no main effect. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.