Demand transitions and sustained attention.

A recent report by the National Research Council (Huey & Wickens, 1993) has identified transitions in task demand as an important dimension for study in vigilance research. This experiment tested the possibility that the effects of such transitions follow a relatively simple psychophysical rule--they are characterized by contrast effects. Transitions in task demand were achieved by shifting subjects from single-task to dual-task monitoring and vice versa. These transitions produced changes in subjects' sensing and decision-making functions that were far more intricate than simple contrast effects. The demand transition issue offers a complex research challenge on both basic and applied levels and warrants further investigation.

[1]  D. Kahneman.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[2]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Capacity Demand in Dual-Task Monitoring of Simultaneous and Successive Vigilance Tasks , 1988 .

[3]  N. Macmillan,et al.  Response bias : characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and nonparametric indexes , 1990 .

[4]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Psychophysics of Vigilance , 1980 .

[5]  J. Warm.  Sustained attention in human performance , 1984 .

[6]  R. Parasuraman.  Vigilance, monitoring, and search. , 1986 .

[7]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Vigilance: Taxonomy And Utility , 1987 .

[8]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[10]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[11]  John F. Corso,et al.  The experimental psychology of sensory behavior , 1970 .

[12]  C. Wickens,et al.  Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance. , 1993 .

[13]  J. ' O'hanlon,et al.  THE EFFECT ON THE LEVEL OF VIGILANCE OF AN ADJACENT SECONDARY VIGILANCE TASK , 1964 .

[14]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[15]  J. Warm,et al.  Effects of shifts in the rate of repetitive stimulation on sustained attention , 1975 .

[16]  R C Williges.  Manipulating the Response Criterion in Visual Monitoring , 1973, Human factors.

[17]  M. Loeb,et al.  The Psychology of Vigilance , 1982 .

[18]  J. A. Horne,et al.  The effects of exercise upon sleep: A critical review , 1981, Biological Psychology.

[19]  Adaptation to Decreasing Signal Probability , 1977 .

[20]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Effects of Task Type and Stimulus Heterogeneity on the Event Rate Function in Sustained Attention , 1987, Human factors.

[21]  T. Engen,et al.  Some sources of error in half-heaviness judgments. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  E. J. Lerner.  Aerospace: The automated cockpit: The digital revolution catches up with commercial airline cockpits and stirs old questions over how many crew members are needed , 1983, IEEE Spectrum.

[23]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  Effects of Temporal Stressors on Vigilance and Information Processing , 1977 .

[24]  R. R. Mackie,et al.  Vigilance: Theory, Operational Performance, and Physiological Correlates , 1978 .

[25]  Douglas Vickers,et al.  Criterion Control in Signal Detection , 1983 .