Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice

IntroductionPatient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were originally developed for comparing groups of people in clinical trials and population studies, and the results were used to support treatment recommendations or inform health policy, but there was not direct benefit for the participants providing PROs data. However, as the experience in using those measures increased, it became obvious the clinical value in using individual patient PROs profiles in daily practice to identify/monitor symptoms, evaluate treatment outcomes and support shared decision-making. A key issue limiting successful implementation is clinicians’ lack of knowledge on how to effectively utilize PROs data in their clinical encounters.MethodsUsing a change management theoretical framework, this paper describes the development and implementation of three programs for training clinicians to effectively use PRO data in routine practice. The training programs are in three diverse clinical areas (adult oncology, lung transplant and paediatrics), in three countries with different healthcare systems, thus providing a rare opportunity to pull out common approaches whilst recognizing specific settings. For each program, we describe the clinical and organizational setting, the program planning and development, the content of the training session with supporting material, subsequent monitoring of PROs use and evidence of adoption. The common successful components and practical steps are identified, leading to discussion and future recommendations.ResultsThe results of the three training programs are described as the implementation. In the oncology program, PRO data have been developed and are currently evaluated; in the lung transplant program, PRO data are used in daily practice and the integration with electronic patient records is under development; and in the paediatric program, PRO data are fully implemented with around 7,600 consultations since the start of the implementation.ConclusionAdult learning programs teaching clinicians how to use and act on PROs in clinical practice are a key steps in supporting patient engagement and participation in shared decision-making. Researchers and clinicians from different clinical areas should collaborate to share ideas, develop guidelines and promote good practice in patient-centred care.

[1]  Jodi B Segal,et al.  Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Putting the Patient Perspective in Patient-centered Outcomes Research , 2013, Medical care.

[2]  David Feeny,et al.  Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management , 2014, Quality of Life Research.

[3]  R. Deyo,et al.  Barriers to the Use of Health Status Measures in Clinical Investigation, Patient Care, and Policy Research , 1989, Medical care.

[4]  P. Selby,et al.  Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI). , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Albert W Wu,et al.  The Use of Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) Within Comparative Effectiveness Research: Implications for Clinical Practice and Health Care Policy , 2012, Medical care.

[6]  Galina Velikova,et al.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Lotte Haverman,et al.  Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[8]  M. Knowles The adult learner : a neglected species , 1979 .

[9]  G. Velikova,et al.  How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in oncology consultations? , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[10]  Lotte Haverman,et al.  Monitoring health-related quality of life in paediatric practice: development of an innovative web-based application , 2011, BMC pediatrics.

[11]  R. Peters Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become , 1970 .

[12]  J. Wit,et al.  Clinicians' perspective on quality of life assessment in paediatric clinical practice , 2004, Acta paediatrica.

[13]  D. Feeny,et al.  Using the Health Utilities Index in Routine Clinical Care: Process, Feasibility, and Acceptability , 2009, The patient.

[14]  R. Grol,et al.  Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice , 1997 .

[15]  A. Riley,et al.  Pediatricians’ Training and Identification and Management of Psychosocial Problems , 2004, Clinical pediatrics.

[16]  K. Meadows,et al.  The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. , 1999, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[17]  Joanne Greenhalgh,et al.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations , 2012, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. , 2014, Journal of oncology practice.

[19]  H. Caron,et al.  Health‐related quality of life in children and emotional reactions of parents following completion of cancer treatment , 2006, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[20]  Hadi Kharrazi,et al.  Measure once, cut twice d adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research , 2013 .

[21]  Joanne Greenhalgh,et al.  The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[22]  Deborah Schrag,et al.  Feasibility of long-term patient self-reporting of toxicities from home via the Internet during routine chemotherapy. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Sally Okun,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Safety Event Reporting: PROSPER Consortium Guidance , 2013, Drug Safety.

[24]  T. Paulussen,et al.  Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[25]  Carl R. Rogers,et al.  Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become , 1969 .

[26]  J. Browne,et al.  The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research , 2014, BMJ quality & safety.

[27]  J. Varni,et al.  Effects of pediatric chronic physical disorders on child and family adjustment. , 1998, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[28]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[29]  David Feeny,et al.  Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[30]  H. Caron,et al.  Reporting health‐related quality of life scores to physicians during routine follow‐up visits of pediatric oncology patients: Is it effective? , 2012, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[31]  J. Varni,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2005 .

[32]  D. Berwick Disseminating innovations in health care. , 2003, JAMA.

[33]  P. Selby,et al.  The clinical value of quality of life assessment in oncology practice—a qualitative study of patient and physician views , 2008, Psycho-oncology.