Violated Laws, Ceteris Paribus Clauses, and Capacities

It is often claimed that the bulk of the laws of physics –including such venerable laws as Universal Gravitation– are violated in many (or even all) circumstances because they havecounter-instances that result when a system is not isolated fromother systems. Various accounts of how one should interpretthese (apparently) violated laws have been provided. In thispaper, I examine two accounts of (apparently) violated laws, thatthey are merely ceteris paribus laws and that they aremanifestations of capacities. Through an examination of theprimary example that motivated these views, I show that given aproper understanding of the situation, neither view is optimalbecause the law is not even apparently violated. Along the way, Iam able to diagnose what has led to the mistaken belief: I showthat it originates from an element of the standard empiricistconception of laws. I then evaluate the suggestions of how tointerpret violated laws with respect to other examples and findthem wanting there too.

[1]  N. Cartwright.  Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement , 1995 .

[2]  J. Fodor.  You can fool some of the people all of the time , 1991 .

[3]  N. T. Roseveare.  Mercury''s perihelion from Le Verrier to Einstein , 1982 .

[4]  Andreas Hüttemann,et al.  Laws and Dispositions , 1998 .

[5]  John Roberts,et al.  CETERIS PARIBUS, THERE IS NO PROBLEM OF PROVISOS , 1999, Synthese.

[6]  Clifford Ambrose Truesdell,et al.  A first course in rational continuum mechanics , 1976 .

[7]  A. Zemanian,et al.  Distribution theory and transform analysis , 1966 .

[8]  Carl G. Hempel,et al.  Provisoes: A problem concerning the inferential function of scientific theories , 1988 .

[9]  Law along the Frontier: Differential Equations and Their Boundary Conditions , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[10]  Georges Rey,et al.  When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity , 1995, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[11]  A. Cemal Eringen,et al.  Mechanics of continua , 1967 .

[12]  P. Lipton.  All Else Being Equal , 1999, Philosophy.

[13]  L. E. Malvern.  Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium , 1969 .

[14]  Wesley C. Salmon,et al.  The Limitations of Deductivism , 1988 .

[15]  R. Giere.  The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science , 2003 .

[16]  Marc Lange,et al.  Natural laws and the problem of provisos , 1993 .

[17]  Sheldon R. Smith.  Resolving Russell's Anti-Realism About Causation: The Connection Between Causation and the Functional Dependencies of Mathematical Physics , 2000 .

[18]  N. Cartwright.  How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .

[19]  G. Joseph,et al.  The Many Sciences and the One World , 1980 .

[20]  N. Cartwright.  The dappled world : a study of the boundaries of science , 1999 .

[21]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Science without laws , 1999 .

[22]  S. Antman.  Nonlinear problems of elasticity , 1994 .