Does the impedance of above-knee powered prostheses need to be adjusted for load-carrying conditions?

Powered knee prostheses provide substantial advantages for amputees compared to traditional passive devices during basic walking tasks (i.e. level-ground, stairs, ramps), but the impedance control parameters are fixed. For environments that differ from the well-controlled setting of the clinic, amputees must compensate their gait patterns because fixed control parameters ideal for walking on level ground in the clinic do not meet real-life task demands. Load carriage is one instance where fixed control parameters may lead to undesired gait patterns and potentially result in injury. To evaluate the importance of impedance control parameters for different walking tasks, we tested one above-knee amputee walking using an experimental powered prosthesis under four walking conditions. The amputee walked with and without added mass with both load-specific and non-specific impedance control parameters. The load-specific parameters significantly reduced the amputee's intact-leg compensations, asymmetry, and perceived exertion compared to the non-specific control parameters. Powered lower limb prostheses that modulate impedance control parameters for load-carrying tasks may improve the gait performance, safety, and comfort of amputees.

[1]  Rodger Kram,et al.  The metabolic and mechanical costs of step time asymmetry in walking , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Sean S Doyle,et al.  Changes to level ground transtibial amputee gait with a weighted backpack. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Prosthesis and wheelchair use in veterans with lower-limb amputation. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  V. Wright,et al.  Bone and joint changes in lower limb amputees. , 1978, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  A. Lees,et al.  Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[8]  Miroslav Janura,et al.  Temporal–spatial parameters of gait in transfemoral amputees: Comparison of bionic and mechanically passive knee joints , 2014, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  B. Goslin,et al.  The perception of exertion during load carriage. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[10]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Improving Finite State Impedance Control of Active-Transfemoral Prosthesis Using Dempster-Shafer Based State Transition Rules , 2014, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[11]  S. Delp,et al.  Men and women adopt similar walking mechanics and muscle activation patterns during load carriage. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Therezinha Rosane Chamlian.  Use of prostheses in lower limb amputee patients due to peripheral arterial disease , 2014, Einstein.

[13]  A. Kuo,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  H. J. de Jongh,et al.  Prosthetic gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees: a kinematic study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  He Huang,et al.  A Cyber Expert System for Auto-Tuning Powered Prosthesis Impedance Control Parameters , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Hugh Herr,et al.  Agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis: a preliminary study in level-ground walking. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .

[18]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  W. Miller,et al.  The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.