More than a Bit of Fun: The Multiple Outcomes of a Bioblitz

Abstract Bioblitzes are a popular approach to engage people and collect biodiversity data. Despite this, few studies have actually evaluated the multiple outcomes of bioblitz activities. We used a systematic review, an analysis of data from more than 1000 bioblitzes, and a detailed analysis of one specific bioblitz to inform our inquiry. We evaluated five possible bioblitz outcomes, which were creating a species inventory, engaging people in biological recording, enhancing learning about nature, discovering a species new to an area, and promoting an organization. We conclude that bioblitzes are diverse but overall effective at their aims and have advantages over unstructured biodiversity recording. We demonstrate for the first time that bioblitzes increase the recording activity of the participants for several months after the event. In addition, we provide evidence that bioblitzes are effective at bringing people and organizations together to build communities of professionals and amateurs, critical for conserving and protecting biodiversity.

[1]  S. Knudsen,et al.  A National Scale “BioBlitz” Using Citizen Science and eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Coastal Marine Fish , 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[2]  Osvaldo Eric Ramírez Bravo,et al.  Ciencia ciudadana y biodiversidad en entornos urbanos: lecciones aprendidas en la Ciudad de Puebla y su zona conurbada en el centro de México , 2022, Cuadernos de Biodiversidad.

[3]  M. Kusrini,et al.  Increasing Herpetofauna Data Through Citizen Science in Indonesia , 2022, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[4]  P. Burn,et al.  Useful Biodiversity Data Were Obtained by Novice Observers Using iNaturalist During College Orientation Retreats , 2021, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice.

[5]  Colleen Hitchcock,et al.  Cultivating Bioliteracy, Biodiscovery, Data Literacy, and Ecological Monitoring in Undergraduate Courses with iNaturalist , 2021, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice.

[6]  A. Mui,et al.  Exploring the value of a BioBlitz as a biodiversity education tool in a post-secondary environment , 2021, Environmental Education Research.

[7]  Rebecca F. Johnson,et al.  How Do Young Community and Citizen Science Volunteers Support Scientific Research on Biodiversity? The Case of iNaturalist , 2021, Diversity.

[8]  Lincoln R. Larson,et al.  Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding , 2021, Science.

[9]  Rebecca F. Johnson,et al.  Step by step towards citizen science — deconstructing youth participation in BioBlitzes , 2021, JCOM, Journal of science communication.

[10]  R. Bonney.  Expanding the Impact of Citizen Science , 2021 .

[11]  S. West,et al.  The Diversity of Participants in Environmental Citizen Science , 2021 .

[12]  Rachel S. Meyer,et al.  The CALeDNA program: Citizen scientists and researchers inventory California's biodiversity , 2021, California Agriculture.

[13]  T. Höffler,et al.  Biodiversity citizen science: Outcomes for the participating citizens , 2021, People and Nature.

[14]  M. Teodósio,et al.  Citizen Science and Biological Invasions: A Review , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[15]  J. M. Rubio-Iglesias,et al.  Citizen Science and Environmental Protection Agencies: Engaging Citizens to Address Key Environmental Challenges , 2020, Frontiers in Climate.

[16]  John H. Wilshire,et al.  Three Frontiers for the Future of Biodiversity Research Using Citizen Science Data , 2020 .

[17]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  An urban Blitz with a twist: rapid biodiversity assessment using aquatic environmental DNA , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[18]  Tim Adriaens,et al.  Vespa-Watch: Invasiemonitoring van de Aziatische hoornaar met hobbyimkers en het publiek. Eindrapport in het kader van de oproep Citizen Science van het Departement Economie, Wetenschap en Innovatie (EWI) van december 2017 , 2020 .

[19]  Soledad Altrudi.  Connecting to nature through tech? The case of the iNaturalist app , 2020 .

[20]  E. Welk,et al.  Transdisciplinary Bioblitz: Rapid biotic and abiotic inventory allows studying environmental changes over 60 years at the Biological Field Station of Paimpont (Brittany, France) and opens new interdisciplinary research opportunities , 2020, Biodiversity data journal.

[21]  Mark A. Rollins,et al.  iNaturalist as an engaging tool for identifying organisms in outdoor activities , 2020, Journal of Biological Education.

[22]  L. Wantiez,et al.  Citizen Science, a promising tool for detecting and monitoring outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster spp. , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Damiano Oldoni,et al.  A checklist recipe: making species data open and FAIR , 2020, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[24]  John Wieczorek,et al.  Improving Darwin Core for research and management of alien species , 2019, Biodiversity Information Science and Standards.

[25]  T. Diekötter,et al.  Participant Outcomes of Biodiversity Citizen Science Projects: A Systematic Literature Review , 2019, Sustainability.

[26]  Nathan R. Prestopnik,et al.  Exploring the impact of game framing and task framing on user participation in citizen science projects , 2019, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[27]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Using Semistructured Surveys to Improve Citizen Science Data for Monitoring Biodiversity , 2019, Bioscience.

[28]  M. Nielsen,et al.  Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices and experimental design for genomic studies , 2019, PeerJ.

[29]  H. Huyse,et al.  Citizen science on speed? Realising the triple objective of scientific rigour, policy influence and deep citizen engagement in a large-scale citizen science project on ambient air quality in Antwerp , 2019 .

[30]  Nadine Ruppert,et al.  Further advancing the expert bioblitz for the rainforest conservation toolkit , 2019, Conservation Science and Practice.

[31]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[32]  Helen E. Roy,et al.  Developing the global potential of citizen science: Assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa , 2018, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[33]  R. Owen,et al.  Citizen science in environmental protection agencies , 2018, Citizen Science.

[34]  Brian S. Cohen,et al.  Adapting the bioblitz to meet conservation needs , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[35]  R. Dunkley.  Monitoring ecological change inUKwoodlands and rivers: An exploration of the relational geographies of citizen science , 2018, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.

[36]  M. Pocock,et al.  Increasing understanding of alien species through citizen science (Alien-CSI) , 2018, Research Ideas and Outcomes.

[37]  Graham C. Smith,et al.  Economical crowdsourcing for camera trap image classification , 2018, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[38]  Jaume Piera,et al.  Developing Mobile Applications for Environmental and Biodiversity Citizen Science: Considerations and Recommendations , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications for Environmental & Biodiversity Informatics.

[39]  Matthew Postles,et al.  The rise of BioBlitz: Evaluating a popular event format for public engagement and wildlife recording in the United Kingdom , 2018 .

[40]  J. K. Legind,et al.  Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring , 2017 .

[41]  Marc Lavielle,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Mixed Effect Models Using saemix, an R Implementation of the SAEM Algorithm , 2017 .

[42]  S. McKirdy,et al.  Many eyes on the ground: citizen science is an effective early detection tool for biosecurity , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[43]  Ailene K. Ettinger,et al.  The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool , 2017 .

[44]  Kara M Million.  Darter Festival and BioBlitz Raise Public Awareness of Three Endangered Fish Species in Alabama , 2016 .

[45]  Tatsuya Amano,et al.  Spatial Gaps in Global Biodiversity Information and the Role of Citizen Science , 2016 .

[46]  E. Roger,et al.  BioBlitzes help science communicators engage local communities in environmental research , 2016 .

[47]  N. Lorusso,et al.  Personal BioBlitz: A New Way to Encourage Biodiversity Discovery and Knowledge in K–99 Education and Outreach , 2015 .

[48]  Lyubomir Penev,et al.  Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve , 2015, Biodiversity data journal.

[49]  Timos Papadopoulos,et al.  Emerging technologies for biological recording , 2015 .

[50]  Quentin Groom,et al.  Trying to engage the crowd in recording invasive alien species in Europe: experiences from two smartphone applications in northwest Europe , 2015 .

[51]  Quentin Groom,et al.  The importance of open data for invasive alien species research, policy and management , 2015 .

[52]  Lesandro Ponciano,et al.  Finding Volunteers' Engagement Profiles in Human Computation for Citizen Science Projects , 2014, Hum. Comput..

[53]  Daryl R. Karns,et al.  Results of the Loblolly Marsh Wetland Preserve BioBlitz, Jay County, Indiana , 2014 .

[54]  Rajul E. Pandya,et al.  A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the US , 2012 .

[55]  B. Duman.  The Effects of Brain-Based Learning on the Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. , 2010 .

[56]  Gretchen J. A. Hansen,et al.  A Pound of Prevention, Plus a Pound of Cure: Early Detection and Eradication of Invasive Species in the Laurentian Great Lakes , 2010 .

[57]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[58]  Lynn D. Dierking,et al.  Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning , 2007 .

[59]  D. Richardson,et al.  Risk Assessment of Riparian Plant Invasions into Protected Areas , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[60]  C. Lundmark.  BioBlitz: Getting into Backyard Biodiversity , 2003 .

[61]  S. Miller,et al.  Quantifying Biodiversity: Experience with Parataxonomists and Digital Photography in Papua New Guinea and Guyana , 2000 .

[62]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Why biodiversity surveys are good value , 1999, Nature.

[63]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[64]  Pamela J. Schofield,et al.  Expert bioblitzes facilitate non-native fish tracking and interagency partnerships , 2020 .

[65]  James K. Adams,et al.  Results of a Fall and Spring BioBlitz at Grassy Pond Recreational Area, Lowndes County, Georgia. , 2019 .

[66]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  A Vision for Global Biodiversity Monitoring With Citizen Science , 2018 .

[67]  G. Ruiz,et al.  Bioblitz 2016: Re-assessing marine invasions in Valdez, Prince William Sound, Alaska , 2017 .

[68]  Chris Sandbrook,et al.  Pokémon Go: Benefits, Costs, and Lessons for the Conservation Movement , 2017 .

[69]  W. Rabitsch,et al.  Making the EU Legislation on Invasive Species a Conservation Success , 2017 .

[70]  Brianna Rosamilia.  Perceptions of Bioblitz Organizers and Participants on Event-Related Goals, Interactions, and Motivations: A Way To Understand How a Bioblitz Contributes to Environmental Education , 2016 .

[71]  M. Tocher,et al.  Guidelines for undertaking rapid biodiversity assessments in terrestrial and marine environments in the Pacific , 2014 .

[72]  L. Alonso,et al.  Still counting- : biodiversity exploration for conservation : the first 20 years of the Rapid Assessment Program , 2011 .

[73]  Andrew Burns,et al.  Technology diffusion in the developing world , 2009 .

[74]  COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS , 2008 .

[75]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Best practices for the prevention and management of invasive alien species. , 2005 .

[76]  Steven E. Stemler.  Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation A Comparison of Consensus, Consistency, and Measurement A Comparison of Consensus, Consistency, and Measurement Approaches to Estimating Interrater Reliability Approaches to Estimating Interrater Reliabilit , 2022 .

[77]  G. Ruiz,et al.  Toward Understanding Patterns of Coastal Marine Invasions: A Prospectus , 2002 .