The non-market value of reclaimed wastewater for use in agriculture: a contingent valuation approach

The reuse of treated water for agricultural irrigation is considered a promising option in regions facing water scarcity problems and there is an increasing number of reuse projects going on in southern European countries. The aim of this paper is to estimate the non-market benefits that society attaches to the use of reclaimed wastewater for agricultural purposes, as part of the economic assessment needed to evaluate the viability of this water management option. For this purpose, a contingent valuation study has been developed in the Segura River Basin in south-eastern Spain, interviewing 352 individuals from a representative sample of the basin’s population. Results show that the use of reclaimed wastewater for irrigation has significant non-market environmental benefits (mean willingness to pay of €5.13 per month per household, which adds up to a total annual value of €23.3 million). In terms of volume, these benefits represent €0.31 m ‐3 . Therefore, it can be concluded that the non-market benefits of using reclaimed wastewater for agriculture justify its implementation, as they overcome the average treatment costs of €0.16-0.26 m ‐3 . Additionally, the analysis of preference heterogeneity suggests that the use of reclaimed wastewater in agriculture is more acceptable to people if they are made aware of their current payment for water sanitation. The inclusion of these non-market benefits in the overall assessment of water policy options will lead to better informed and more efficient water management decisions. Additional key words: environmental benefits; irrigation; Segura Basin; Spain; Water Framework Directive. Resumen Valor no de mercado del uso de agua depurada en agricultura: una aproximacion por valoracion contingente El uso de aguas depuradas en la agricultura es considerado una opcion prometedora para aquellas zonas que presentan problemas de escasez y de ahi el creciente numero de proyectos de reutilizacion del agua llevados a cabo en los paises del sur de Europa. El objetivo de este trabajo es estimar los beneficios no de mercado que la sociedad otorga al uso de aguas depuradas para uso agricola, como parte de la valoracion economica necesaria para conocer la via

[1]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  Valoración económica de los beneficios ambientales de no mercado derivados de la mejora de la calidad del agua: una estimación en aplicación de la Directiva Marco del Agua al Guadalquivir , 2011 .

[2]  Raquel Iglesias Esteban,et al.  Present and future of wastewater reuse in Spain , 2008 .

[3]  Julia Martín-Ortega,et al.  Beneficios y costes ambientales en la Directiva Marco del Agua: conceptos y estimación , 2008 .

[4]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: an empirical approach for Spain. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  E. Birol,et al.  Assessing the economic viability of alternative water resources in water scarce regions: The roles of economic valuation, cost–benefit analysis and discounting , 2009 .

[6]  C. Persad,et al.  Basic principles for selecting phases for high temperature metal matrix composites: interfacial considerations , 1988 .

[7]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Environmental Benefits of Wastewater Treatment: An Economic Valuation , 2009 .

[8]  Liqa Raschid-Sally,et al.  Wastewater Use in Irrigated Agriculture: Confronting the Livelihood and Environmental Realities , 2004 .

[9]  S. Yoo,et al.  Dealing with zero response data from contingent valuation surveys: application of least absolute deviations estimator , 2000 .

[10]  Nick Hanley.  Ethical Beliefs and Behaviour in Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1996 .

[11]  R. Mendelsohn,et al.  Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology , 2007 .

[12]  Eban S. Goodstein.  Economics and the environment , 1995 .

[13]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[14]  R. S. D. Motta,et al.  The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil) , 2008 .

[15]  F. H. Sancho,et al.  Estimating the economic value of a river water quality with a double approach: an application to the principles of the Water Frame Directive. , 2011 .

[16]  Y. Fujita.  Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation Method for Coral Reefs in Kerama Islands , 2003 .

[17]  D. Pearce,et al.  Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques Summary Guide , 2002 .

[18]  I. Bateman.  Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport , 2002 .

[19]  J. Tobin.  Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables , 1958 .

[20]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP , 2006 .

[22]  Overview of existing guidelines and manuals for the economic valuation of environmental and resource costs and benefits , 2006 .

[23]  H. Bouwer.  Agricultural and Municipal Use of Wastewater , 1992 .

[24]  T. Amemiya.  Tobit models: A survey , 1984 .

[25]  Francesc Hernández-Sancho,et al.  The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .

[27]  R. S. D. Motta.  Economics of natural resources and the environment , 1990 .

[28]  Julio Berbel,et al.  Using multi-criteria analysis to explore non-market monetary values of water quality changes in the context of the Water Framework Directive. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  Bruce E. Lindsay,et al.  Use of the tobit model in contingent valuation : experimental evidence from the pemigewasset wilderness area , 1991 .

[30]  F. Messner,et al.  Applying Participatory Multicriteria Methods to River Basin Management: Improving the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive , 2006 .

[31]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Environmental Valuation Techniques in Water Resource Decision Making , 2000 .

[32]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs , 2008 .

[33]  Peter A. Groothuis,et al.  Testing for non-response and sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Analysis of a combination phone/mail survey , 1993 .

[34]  Edward J. Balistreri,et al.  Can Hypothetical Questions Reveal True Values? A Laboratory Comparison of Dichotomous Choice and Open-Ended Contingent Values with Auction Values , 2001 .

[35]  John Hicks,et al.  The Four Consumer's Surpluses , 1943 .

[36]  Other.  Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of The Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy (Water Framework Directive) , 2000 .

[37]  R. Ready,et al.  How Do Respondents with Uncertain Willingness to Pay Answer Contingent Valuation Questions? , 2001, Land Economics.

[38]  Phoebe Koundouri,et al.  Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.