When is a search not a search? A comparison of searching the AMED complementary health database via EBSCOhost, OVID and DIALOG.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Wenz,et al. Searching the medical literature. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[2] C. Adams,et al. Searching the right database. A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals. , 1999, Health libraries review.
[3] E D Johnson,et al. Criteria for evaluating alternative MEDLINE search engines. , 1998, Medical reference services quarterly.
[4] D Schoonbaert. SPIRS, WinSPIRS, and OVID: a comparison of three MEDLINE-on-CD-ROM interfaces. , 1996, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.
[5] Doris B. Marshall. To Improve Searching, Check Search Results. , 1980 .
[6] Melody M. Allison. Comparison of CINAHL® via EBSCOhost®, Ovid®, and ProQuest® , 2006 .
[7] Sandy L. De Groote,et al. PubMed, internet grateful med, and Ovid: A comparison of three MEDLINE internet interfaces , 2000 .
[8] Nancy L Wilczynski,et al. Optimal CINAHL search strategies for identifying therapy studies and review articles. , 2006, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.
[9] Christine Urquhart,et al. Health professionals’ attitudes towards evidence-based medicine and the role of the information professional in exploitation of the research evidence , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..
[10] Tammy Hoffmann,et al. The value of an evidence database for occupational therapists: An international online survey , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[11] D. J. Owen,et al. Information-seeking behavior in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): an online survey of faculty at a health sciences campus. , 2003, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[12] B. Haynes. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions. , 2006, Evidence-based nursing.
[13] B. Haynes. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the “5S” evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions , 2007, Evidence-based medicine.
[14] Glenn Fink,et al. Googling Medical Topics Returns Decent Results , 2006 .
[15] Sandy L. De Groote Mlis. PubMed, Internet Grateful Med, and Ovid , 2008 .
[16] Johanna I. Westbrook,et al. Allied health professionals' use of online evidence: a survey of 790 staff working in the Australian public hospital system , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[17] D. J. Roberts. AMED: a bibliographic database for complementary medicine and allied health , 1995 .
[18] A. Long,et al. Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness. , 2001, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.
[19] Catherine Arnott Smith,et al. An evolution of experts: MEDLINE in the library school. , 2005 .
[20] M. Bonham,et al. An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE. , 1988, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.
[21] C. Begley,et al. Selecting a database for literature searches in nursing: MEDLINE or CINAHL? , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.
[22] J. Craig,et al. The Evidence Based Practice Manual for Nurses , 2002 .
[23] K. Dickersin,et al. Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1994 .
[24] Feinglos Sj. MEDLINE at BRS, DIALOG, and NLM: is there a choice? , 1983 .