Low-cost, easy-to-build noninvasive pressure support ventilator for under-resourced regions: open source hardware description, performance and feasibility testing

Aim Current pricing of commercial mechanical ventilators in low-/middle-income countries (LMICs) markedly restricts their availability, and consequently a considerable number of patients with acute/chronic respiratory failure cannot be adequately treated. Our aim was to design and test an affordable and easy-to-build noninvasive bilevel pressure ventilator to allow a reduction in the serious shortage of ventilators in LMICs. Methods The ventilator was built using off-the-shelf materials available via e-commerce and was based on a high-pressure blower, two pressure transducers and an Arduino Nano controller with a digital display (total retail cost <75 USD), with construction details provided open source for free replication. The ventilator was evaluated, and compared with a commercially available device (Lumis 150 ventilator; Resmed, San Diego, CA, USA): 1) in the bench setting using an actively breathing patient simulator mimicking a range of obstructive/restrictive diseases; and b) in 12 healthy volunteers wearing high airway resistance and thoracic/abdominal bands to mimic obstructive/restrictive patients. Results The designed ventilator provided inspiratory/expiratory pressures up to 20/10 cmH2O, respectively, with no faulty triggering or cycling; both in the bench test and in volunteers. The breathing difficulty score rated (1–10 scale) by the loaded breathing subjects was significantly (p<0.005) decreased from 5.45±1.68 without support to 2.83±1.66 when using the prototype ventilator, which showed no difference with the commercial device (2.80±1.48; p=1.000). Conclusion The low-cost, easy-to-build noninvasive ventilator performs similarly to a high-quality commercial device, with its open-source hardware description, which will allow for free replication and use in LMICs, facilitating application of this life-saving therapy to patients who otherwise could not be treated. Patients in under-resourced areas cannot be treated by mechanical ventilation given the unaffordable cost of conventional devices; here a low-cost, easy-to-build ventilator with open access details for free replication is designed and tested https://bit.ly/34UcbWp

[1]  D. Navajas,et al.  Novel Approach for Providing Pediatric Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Devices in Low-Income, Underresourced Regions. , 2019, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  R. Kacmarek,et al.  Trigger performance of mid-level ICU mechanical ventilators during assisted ventilation: a bench study , 2008, Intensive Care Medicine.

[3]  Robert D Truog,et al.  The Toughest Triage - Allocating Ventilators in a Pandemic. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Ramon Farré,et al.  Bench model to simulate upper airway obstruction for analyzing automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices. , 2006, Chest.

[5]  J Guttmann,et al.  Respiratory comfort and breathing pattern during volume proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation: A study on volunteers with artificially reduced compliance , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[6]  Thomas Similowski,et al.  When Breathing Interferes with Cognition: Experimental Inspiratory Loading Alters Timed Up-and-Go Test in Normal Humans , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Joshua M. Pearce.  Quantifying the Value of Open Source Hardware Development , 2014, Modern Economy.

[8]  D. Navajas,et al.  Response of automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices to different sleep breathing patterns: a bench study. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  D. Hess,et al.  Performance characteristics of bilevel pressure ventilators: a lung model study. , 1997, Chest.

[10]  Carmelo De Maria,et al.  Open Source Biomedical Engineering for Sustainability in African Healthcare: Combining Academic Excellence with Innovation , 2014, ICDS 2014.

[11]  Parisa Eslambolchilar,et al.  Open-source hardware for medical devices , 2016, BMJ Innovations.

[12]  P. Navalesi,et al.  Bench studies evaluating devices for non-invasive ventilation: critical analysis and future perspectives , 2011, Intensive Care Medicine.

[13]  M. Eberlein,et al.  Chest wall strapping. An old physiology experiment with new relevance to small airways diseases. , 2014, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[14]  L. Blanch,et al.  Effect of Leak and Breathing Pattern on the Accuracy of Tidal Volume Estimation by Commercial Home Ventilators: A Bench Study , 2013, Respiratory Care.

[15]  C. Sullivan.  ERS Special Article. Nasal Positive Airway Pressure and Sleep Apnea. Reflections on an Experimental Method That Became a Therapy , 2018, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[16]  R. Adegbola,et al.  Beyond good intentions: lessons on equipment donation from an African hospital. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[17]  D. Navajas,et al.  Comparative assessment of several automatic CPAP devices' responses: a bench test study , 2015, ERJ Open Research.

[18]  D. Navajas,et al.  Novel Approach to Simulate Sleep Apnea Patients for Evaluating Positive Pressure Therapy Devices , 2016, PloS one.

[19]  Joshua M. Pearce.  Maximizing returns for public funding of medical research with open-source hardware , 2017 .

[20]  S. Keenan,et al.  Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure , 2017, European Respiratory Journal.

[21]  R. Farré,et al.  Mimicking a flow-limited human upper airway using a collapsible tube: relationships between flow patterns and pressures in a respiratory model. , 2018, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  K. Geiger,et al.  Breathing pattern and perception at different levels of volume assist and pressure support in volunteers , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[23]  S. Murthy,et al.  Intensive Care Unit Capacity in Low-Income Countries: A Systematic Review , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  Yan Zhao,et al.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. , 2020, JAMA.

[25]  P. Mujinja,et al.  Rethinking health sector procurement as developmental linkages in East Africa. , 2018, Social science & medicine.

[26]  J. DePasse,et al.  Affordable medical technologies: bringing Value-Based Design into global health , 2016, BMJ Innovations.

[27]  Srinivas Murthy,et al.  Non‐invasive ventilation in children and adults in low‐ and low‐middle income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, Journal of critical care.

[28]  D. Navajas,et al.  Easy-to-build and affordable continuous positive airway pressure CPAP device for adult patients in low-income countries , 2019, European Respiratory Journal.

[29]  L. Brochard,et al.  Patient-ventilator asynchrony during noninvasive ventilation: a bench and clinical study. , 2012, Chest.

[30]  D. Navajas,et al.  Technology for noninvasive mechanical ventilation: looking into the black box , 2016, ERJ Open Research.

[31]  O. Moerer,et al.  Patient-Ventilator Interaction During Noninvasive Ventilation in Simulated COPD , 2016, Respiratory Care.

[32]  S. Jaber,et al.  Performance characteristics of 10 home mechanical ventilators in pressure-support mode: a comparative bench study. , 2005, Chest.

[33]  O. Blanke,et al.  Interferences between breathing, experimental dyspnoea and bodily self-consciousness , 2017, Scientific Reports.