Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E. Deci,et al. The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .
[2] Helen Crompton,et al. Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education , 2020, Contemporary Educational Psychology.
[3] Matthew L. Bernacki,et al. Students authoring personalized “algebra stories”: Problem-posing in the context of out-of-school interests , 2015 .
[4] Seymour Papert,et al. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .
[5] Vincent Aleven,et al. Towards Sensor-Free Affect Detection in Cognitive Tutor Algebra. , 2012, EDM 2012.
[6] E. Beese. A process perspective on research and design issues in educational personalization , 2019, Theory and Research in Education.
[7] Chris S. Hulleman,et al. Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. , 2010 .
[8] M. Peters,et al. Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology , 2011 .
[9] Candace Walkington,et al. Personalizing Algebra to Students’ Individual Interests in an Intelligent Tutoring System: Moderators of Impact , 2018, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
[10] Mingyu Feng,et al. An Efficacy Study of a Digital Core Curriculum for Grade 5 Mathematics , 2019, AERA Open.
[11] L. Schauble,et al. Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .
[12] Steven Netcoh. Balancing freedom and limitations: A case study of choice provision in a personalized learning class , 2017 .
[13] Seymour Papert,et al. The Children's Machine , 1993 .
[14] M. McDaniel,et al. Learning Styles , 2008, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.
[15] S. Järvelä,et al. Self-Regulated, Co-Regulated, and Socially Shared Regulation of Learning , 2011 .
[16] Erika A. Patall. Constructing motivation through choice, interest, and interestingness , 2013 .
[17] Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al. Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale , 2014 .
[18] B. B.,et al. BOOK REVIEW Make Learning Personal: The What, Who, Wow, Where, And Why , 2020 .
[19] Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al. Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017 , 2019, Comput. Educ..
[20] Mingyu Feng,et al. Online Mathematics Homework Increases Student Achievement , 2016 .
[21] Allan Collins,et al. Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .
[22] Luis C. Moll,et al. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms , 1992 .
[23] Candace Walkington,et al. Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. , 2013 .
[24] Beth A. Rogowsky,et al. Matching Learning Style to Instructional Method: Effects on Comprehension. , 2015 .
[25] Edward L. Deci,et al. The initiation and regulation of intrinsically motivated learning and achievement. , 1992 .
[26] Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al. Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades. ERIC Digest. , 2000 .
[27] R. Reber,et al. Effects of Example Choice on Interest, Control, and Learning , 2009 .
[28] Erika A. Patall,et al. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.
[29] B. Means,et al. The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2013, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[30] Noel Enyedy,et al. New Interest, Old Rhetoric, Limited Results, and the Need for a New Direction for Computer-Mediated Learning , 2014 .
[31] Matthew L. Bernacki,et al. The Role of Situational Interest in Personalized Learning , 2018, Journal of Educational Psychology.
[32] Larry Cuban. Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America , 2010 .
[33] John F. Pane,et al. Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning: Survey Results Addendum , 2015 .
[34] Etienne Wenger,et al. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .
[35] M. Lepper,et al. Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .
[36] Gordon Ellis,et al. Grand challenges for engineering , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.
[37] Vincent Aleven,et al. Active Learners: Redesigning an Intelligent Tutoring System to Support Self-regulated Learning , 2013, EC-TEL.
[38] S. Hidi,et al. The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development , 2006 .
[39] L. Hamilton,et al. Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning , 2015 .
[40] K. Squire,et al. Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .
[41] R. Reber,et al. Supporting interest of middle school students in mathematics through context personalization and example choice , 2015 .
[42] B. Bloom. Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. , 1968 .
[43] E. Deci,et al. Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. , 2002 .
[44] Candace Walkington,et al. Motivating Students by “Personalizing” Learning Around Individual Interests: A Consideration of Theory, Design and Implementation Issues , 2014 .
[45] K. Ann Renninger,et al. The Power of Interest for Motivation and Engagement , 2015 .
[46] Susan E. Thomas. Future Ready Learning: Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education. 2016 National Education Technology Plan. , 2016 .