4D PET iterative deconvolution with spatiotemporal regularization for quantitative dynamic PET imaging

Quantitative measurements in dynamic PET imaging are usually limited by the poor counting statistics particularly in short dynamic frames and by the low spatial resolution of the detection system, resulting in partial volume effects (PVEs). In this work, we present a fast and easy to implement method for the restoration of dynamic PET images that have suffered from both PVE and noise degradation. It is based on a weighted least squares iterative deconvolution approach of the dynamic PET image with spatial and temporal regularization. Using simulated dynamic [(11)C] Raclopride PET data with controlled biological variations in the striata between scans, we showed that the restoration method provides images which exhibit less noise and better contrast between emitting structures than the original images. In addition, the method is able to recover the true time activity curve in the striata region with an error below 3% while it was underestimated by more than 20% without correction. As a result, the method improves the accuracy and reduces the variability of the kinetic parameter estimates calculated from the corrected images. More importantly it increases the accuracy (from less than 66% to more than 95%) of measured biological variations as well as their statistical detectivity.

[1]  D. Bailey,et al.  The direct calculation of parametric images from dynamic PET data using maximum-likelihood iterative reconstruction. , 1997 .

[2]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Evaluation of Three MRI-Based Anatomical Priors for Quantitative PET Brain Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  C. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[4]  Baowei Fei,et al.  An MR image-guided, voxel-based partial volume correction method for PET images. , 2011, Medical physics.

[5]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Statistical approaches in quantitative positron emission tomography , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[6]  Frederic Boisson,et al.  Simulation-based optimisation of the PET data processing for Partial Saturation Approach protocols , 2014, NeuroImage.

[7]  T. Jones,et al.  Parametric image reconstruction using spectral analysis of PET projection data. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  L. Landweber.  An iteration formula for Fredholm integral equations of the first kind , 1951 .

[9]  Jun Soo Kwon,et al.  Partial Volume Correction using Structural–Functional Synergistic Resolution Recovery: Comparison with Geometric Transfer Matrix Method , 2013, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[10]  J. Fessler,et al.  Objective functions for tomographic reconstruction from randoms-precorrected PET scans , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[11]  Mohamed-Jalal Fadili,et al.  The Undecimated Wavelet Decomposition and its Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  A. Reilhac,et al.  PET-SORTEO: validation and development of database of Simulated PET volumes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Development of a 4-D digital mouse phantom for molecular imaging research. , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Characterisation of partial volume effect and region-based correction in small animal positron emission tomography (PET) of the rat brain , 2012, NeuroImage.

[15]  Vincent J. Cunningham,et al.  Parametric Imaging of Ligand-Receptor Binding in PET Using a Simplified Reference Region Model , 1997, NeuroImage.

[16]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Deconvolution-based partial volume correction in Raclopride-PET and Monte Carlo comparison to MR-based method , 2008, NeuroImage.

[17]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Analytical positron range modelling in heterogeneous media for PET Monte Carlo simulation , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Incorporation of wavelet-based denoising in iterative deconvolution for partial volume correction in whole-body PET imaging , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  D Visvikis,et al.  A multiresolution image based approach for correction of partial volume effects in emission tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Joint estimation of dynamic PET images and temporal basis functions using fully 4D ML-EM , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[22]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Anatomically guided voxel-based partial volume effect correction in brain PET: Impact of MRI segmentation , 2012, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[23]  C. Comtat,et al.  Fully 4D image reconstruction by estimation of an input function and spectral coefficients , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[24]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies , 2008, NeuroImage.

[25]  A. Evans,et al.  Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  T. Jones,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Dynamic PET Studies , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[27]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[28]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[29]  S. Libutti,et al.  Partial-Volume Correction in PET: Validation of an Iterative Postreconstruction Method with Phantom and Patient Data , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  I. Buvat,et al.  Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  Impact of fully 4D reconstruction on kinetic parameter estimates , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[32]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  What approach to brain partial volume correction is best for PET/MRI? , 2013 .

[33]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Evaluation of a 3 D local multi-resolution algorithm for the correction of partial volume effects in positron emission tomography , 2011 .

[34]  M. Modat,et al.  The importance of appropriate partial volume correction for PET quantification in Alzheimer’s disease , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[35]  Vincent Frouin,et al.  Correction of partial-volume effect for PET striatal imaging: fast implementation and study of robustness. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  A. Reilhac,et al.  Simulation-based evaluation of NEG-ML iterative reconstruction of low count PET data , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[37]  F Boisson,et al.  NEMA NU 4-2008 validation and applications of the PET-SORTEO Monte Carlo simulations platform for the geometry of the Inveon PET preclinical scanner. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.