An Exploration of Factors Related to Dissemination of and Exposure to Internet-Delivered Behavior Change Interventions Aimed at Adults: A Delphi Study Approach

Background The Internet is an attractive medium for delivering individualized, computer-tailored behavior change interventions to large numbers of people. However, the actual numbers of people reached seem to fall behind the high expectations. Insight into factors that determine use of and exposure to these Internet interventions is important to be able to increase the reach and improve exposure. Objective The aim was to identify potentially important factors that determine whether adults visit an Internet-delivered behavior change intervention, extend their visit, and revisit the intervention. Methods A systematic, three-round Delphi study was conducted among national and international experts from Internet intervention research and practice, e-marketing/e-commerce, Web design, and technical website development. In the first round, 30 experts completed a structured, open-ended online questionnaire assessing factors that were, in their opinion, important for a first visit, an extended visit, a revisit and for effective promotion strategies. Based on the responses in this first questionnaire, a closed-ended online questionnaire was developed for use in the second round. A total of 233 experts were invited to complete this questionnaire. Median and interquartile deviation (IQD) scores were computed to calculate agreement and consensus on the importance of the factors. The factors for which no consensus was obtained (IQD > 1) were included in the third-round questionnaire. Factors with a median score of six or higher and with an IQD ≤ 1 were considered to be important. Results Of the 62 experts invited for the first round, 30 completed the questionnaire (48% response rate); 93/233 experts completed the second-round questionnaire (40% response rate), and 59/88 completed the third round (67% response rate). Being motivated to visit an Internet intervention and perceiving the intervention as personally relevant appeared to be important factors related to a first visit. The provision of tailored feedback, relevant and reliable information, and an easy navigation structure were related to an extended visit. Provision of regular new content and the possibility to monitor personal progress toward behavior change were identified as important factors to encourage a revisit. Primarily traditional promotion strategies, like word-of-mouth by family and friends, a publicity campaign with simultaneous use of various mass media, and recommendation by health professionals, were indicated as effective ways to encourage adults to visit an Internet intervention. Conclusions This systematic study identified important factors related to the dissemination of and exposure to Internet interventions aimed at adults. In order to improve optimal use of and exposure to Internet interventions, potential users may need to be motivated to visit such an intervention and the information provided needs to be personally relevant. Furthermore, several (technical) aspects of the intervention itself need to be taken into account when developing Internet interventions.

[1]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[2]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[3]  C. Jackson,et al.  Health communication on the Internet: an effective channel for health behavior change? , 1998, Journal of health communication.

[4]  D H Gustafson,et al.  Introduction to evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  Laura R. Olevitch,et al.  Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication With Computer Technology , 1999 .

[6]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[7]  Cathie M Scott,et al.  Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach (3rd ed) , 2001 .

[8]  C Cimino,et al.  Computerized weight loss intervention optimizes staff time: the clinical and cost results of a controlled clinical trial conducted in a managed care setting. , 2001, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[9]  Alison L Marshall,et al.  Print versus website physical activity programs: a randomized trial. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Evaluation of an internet-based physical activity intervention: A preliminary investigation , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[11]  Wayne F Velicer,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Health Behavior Change Programs on the Internet , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[12]  T. Wadden,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a commercial internet weight loss program. , 2004, Obesity research.

[13]  Jean Harvey-Berino,et al.  Effect of internet support on the long-term maintenance of weight loss. , 2004, Obesity research.

[14]  J. Anhøj,et al.  Using the Internet for Life Style Changes in Diet and Physical Activity: A Feasibility Study , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Johannes Brug,et al.  Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study. , 2004, Health education research.

[16]  W. Kroeze,et al.  The internet and nutrition education: challenges and opportunities , 2005, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[17]  Brian G Danaher,et al.  The Information Architecture of Behavior Change Websites , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  J. Brug,et al.  Bevordering van Gezond Gedrag via Internet: Nu en in de Toekomst , 2005 .

[19]  G. Eysenbach The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  Ilima L. Kane,et al.  Web-based strategies to disseminate a sun safety curriculum to public elementary schools and state-licensed child-care facilities. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  A. Bauman,et al.  Engagement and retention of participants in a physical activity website. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[22]  Alison L Marshall,et al.  Website physical activity interventions: preferences of potential users. , 2005, Health education research.

[23]  Patricia K. Weinstein A Review of Weight Loss Programs Delivered Via the Internet , 2006, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[24]  W. Kroeze,et al.  A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[25]  Traci Hong,et al.  Contributing Factors to the Use of Health-Related Websites , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[26]  Helen Christensen,et al.  The Law of Attrition Revisited , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  Brian G Danaher,et al.  Defining Participant Exposure Measures in Web-Based Health Behavior Change Programs , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Russell E Glasgow,et al.  eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[30]  V. H. Hildebrandt,et al.  Rates and Determinants of Repeated Participation in a Web-Based Behavior Change Program for Healthy Body Weight and Healthy Lifestyle , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  J Brug,et al.  Effectiveness of an online computer-tailored physical activity intervention in a real-life setting. , 2006, Health education research.

[32]  J. Brug,et al.  Internet-delivered interventions aimed at adolescents: a Delphi study on dissemination and exposure. , 2008, Health education research.