Mass Properties of the Pig Mandible

Specification of mass properties is an essential step in the modeling of jaw dynamics, but obtaining them can be difficult. Here, we used three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) to estimate jaw mass, mean bone density, anatomical locations of the mass and geometric centers, and moments of inertia in the pig jaw. High-resolution CT scans were performed at one-mm slice intervals on specimens submerged in water. The mean estimated jaw mass was 12% greater than the mean wet weight, and 33% more than the mean dry weight. Putative bone marrow accounted for an extra 13% of mass. There was a positive correlation between estimated mean bone density and age. The mass center was consistently in the midline, near the last molar. The mean distance between the mass center and geometric center was small, especially when bone marrow was taken into account (0.58 ± 0.21 mm), suggesting that mass distribution in the pig jaw is almost symmetrical with respect to its geometric center. The largest moment of inertia occurred around each mandible's superoinferior axis, and the smallest around its anteroposterior axis. Bone marrow contributed an extra 9% to the moments of inertia in all three axes. Linear relationships were found between the actual mass and a mass descriptor (product of the bounding volume and mean bone density), and between the moments of inertia and moments of inertia descriptors (products of the mass descriptor and two orthogonal dimensions forming the bounding box). The study suggests that imaging modalities revealing three-dimensional jaw shape may be adequate for estimating the bone mass properties in pigs.

[1]  G. Langenbach,et al.  The role of passive muscle tensions in a three-dimensional dynamic model of the human jaw. , 1999, Archives of oral biology.

[2]  D. J. Daegling Biomechanics of cross-sectional size and shape in the hominoid mandibular corpus. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  Dr. B. K. B. Berkovitz,et al.  Teeth , 1860, Handbook of Microscopic Anatomy.

[4]  F. Beer Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Statics and Dynamics , 2003 .

[5]  C. Lindh,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. , 1996, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  J. H. Koolstra,et al.  The jaw open-close movements predicted by biomechanical modelling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Otto Fischer,et al.  Determination of the Moments of Inertia of the Human Body and Its Limbs , 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]  Joan T. Richtsmeier,et al.  Precision, Repeatability, and Validation of the Localization of Cranial Landmarks Using Computed Tomography Scans , 1995, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[9]  G M Bydder,et al.  The validity and use of computed tomography attenuation values. , 1980, British medical bulletin.

[10]  M. Jergas,et al.  Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X‐ray absorptiometry , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  W. Koo,et al.  Validation of accuracy and precision of dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry for infants , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  J. Timonen,et al.  Estimation of structural and geometrical properties of cortical bone by computerized tomography in 78‐year‐old women , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  S. Duursma,et al.  CT Densitometry in Osteoporosis , 1984, Series in Radiology.

[14]  E. Otten A myocybernetic model of the jaw system of the rat. , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  R B Mazess,et al.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. , 1990, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[16]  R. Martin,et al.  The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bone strength. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Grier Sj,et al.  The Use of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Animals , 1996 .

[18]  T M van Eijden,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Jaw-closing Movements , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[19]  S. Teng,et al.  Anatomic and Directional Variation in the Mechanical Properties of the Mandibular Condyle in Pigs , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[20]  E. Schneider,et al.  Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  T M van Eijden,et al.  Dynamics of the human masticatory muscles during a jaw open-close movement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  E. O. Crawley In vivo tissue characterization using quantitative computed tomography: a review. , 1990, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[23]  S W Herring,et al.  Compressive loading on bone surfaces from muscular contraction: an in vivo study in the miniature pig, Sus scrofa , 1998, Journal of morphology.

[24]  A. Hannam,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible. , 1992, American journal of physical anthropology.