What are the questionnaire items most useful in identifying subjects with occupational asthma?

The present study assessed the usefulness of key items obtained from a clinical “open” questionnaire prospectively administered to 212 subjects, referred to four tertiary-care hospitals for predicting the diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA). Of these subjects, 72 (34%) were diagnosed as OA (53% with OA due to high-molecular-weight agents) according to results of specific inhalation challenges, and 90 (42%) as non-OA. Wheezing at work occurred in 88% of subjects with OA and was the most specific symptom (85%). Nasal and eye symptoms were commonly associated symptoms. Wheezing, nasal and ocular itching at work were positively, and loss of voice negatively associated with the presence of OA in the case of high-, but not low molecular-weight agents. A prediction model based on responses to nasal itching, daily symptoms over the week at work, nasal secretions, absence of loss of voice, wheezing, and sputum, correctly predicted 156 out of 212 (74%) subjects according to the presence or absence of OA by final diagnosis. In conclusion, key items, i.e. wheezing, nasal and ocular itching and loss of voice, are satisfactorily associated with the presence of occupational asthma in subjects exposed to high-molecular-weight agents. Therefore, these should be addressed with high priority by physicians. However, no questionnaire-derived item is helpful in subjects exposed to low-molecular-weight agents.

[1]  P. Campo,et al.  Clinical Assessment and Management of Occupational Asthma , 2006 .

[2]  J. Malo,et al.  Upper Airways Involvement , 2006 .

[3]  J. Malo,et al.  Immunological and Inflammatory Assessments , 2006 .

[4]  A. Draper,et al.  Occupational Asthma , 2002, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[5]  M. Desrosiers,et al.  Epidemiology of occupational rhinitis: prevalence, aetiology and determinants , 2000, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[6]  C. Lemière,et al.  Persistent specific bronchial reactivity to occupational agents in workers with normal nonspecific bronchial reactivity. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[7]  J. Malo,et al.  Inhalation challenges with agents causing occupational asthma. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[8]  C. Lemière,et al.  Prevalence and intensity of rhinoconjunctivitis in subjects with occupational asthma. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[9]  Romain A. Pauwels GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION , 1996 .

[10]  John L. Hankinson,et al.  Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  J. Malo,et al.  Lung Vascular Injury , 1993 .

[12]  E. Juniper,et al.  Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults , 1993, European Respiratory Journal.

[13]  J. Malo,et al.  Is the clinical history a satisfactory means of diagnosing occupational asthma? , 1991, The American review of respiratory disease.

[14]  Buist As Standardization of spirometry. , 1987 .

[15]  J. Malo,et al.  Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: reproducibility and sensitivity of different indices to assess response. , 1983, Thorax.

[16]  O. Vandenplas,et al.  Occupational Challenge Tests , 2006 .

[17]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[18]  S. Anderson,et al.  Airway responsiveness : standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults , 1993 .

[19]  A. Buist Standardization of spirometry. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.