Understanding Small Solar Magnetic Structures: Comparing Numerical Simulations to Observations

We present direct comparisons of small magnetic structures observed in the solar photosphere with the results from numerical simulations of those structures. We compare diagnostic signatures derived from emergent Stokes polarization spectra from both the observed and model atmospheres, the former recorded with the National Solar Observatory/High Altitude Observatory Advanced Stokes Polarimeter, the latter from a fully dynamic MHD simulation of a magnetic flux sheet in a convective atmosphere. We focus on the asymmetries in the Stokes V spectra and find, first and foremost, that the asymmetries from the observed Stokes I and V in and around solar pores and azimuth centers (ACs) are quantitatively comparable to those derived from the simulation. We also find enhanced Stokes V asymmetry on the periphery of pores and ACs. We interpret this as a consequence of strong downdrafts in the surroundings of these magnetic structures, accompanied by the expansion of the magnetic field lines with height above these field-free downdrafts (the "canopy effect"). The magnetic canopy can be present whether or not there is a continuum signature (i.e., a dark "pore"). Not surprisingly, the patterns and magnitudes of asymmetries scale with the size of the magnetic element. In the interior of the pores and ACs, we find evidence for mixed up- and downflows, with little spatial correlation between the zero-crossing shift of the V profile and the V amplitude. Finally, we report on asymmetries observed in the linear polarization 𝒫lin(λ) = [Q(λ)2 + U(λ)2]1/2, finding further support for the presence of the magnetic canopy from those diagnostics. We additionally present expectations for spectropolarimetric observations at significantly higher spatial resolution.

[1]  O. Steiner The formation of asymmetric Stokes V profiles in the presence of a magnetopause , 2000 .

[2]  A. Hanslmeier,et al.  Temporal Evolution of Fine Structures in and around Solar Pores , 1999 .

[3]  A. Skumanich,et al.  The Evolution of Pores and the Development of Penumbrae , 1998 .

[4]  O. Steiner,et al.  Dynamical Interaction of Solar Magnetic Elements and Granular Convection: Results of a Numerical Simulation , 1998 .

[5]  K. Leka The Vector Magnetic Fields and Thermodynamics of Sunspot Light Bridges: The Case for Field-free Disruptions in Sunspots , 1997 .

[6]  S. Tomczyk,et al.  Stokes Profile Asymmetries in Solar Active Regions , 1997 .

[7]  Andrew Skumanich,et al.  The Calibration of the Advanced Stokes Polarimeter , 1997 .

[8]  V. Pillet,et al.  Active Region Magnetic Fields. I. Plage Fields , 1997 .

[9]  V. Pillet,et al.  Line Asymmetries and the Microstructure of Photospheric Magnetic Fields , 1996 .

[10]  B. Lites,et al.  Performance characteristics of the advanced stokes polarimeter , 1996 .

[11]  Steven Tomczyk,et al.  Advanced Stokes polarimeter: a new instrument for solar magnetic field research , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[12]  A. Skumanich,et al.  Stokes profile analysis and vector magnetic fields. I. Inversion of photospheric lines , 1987 .

[13]  E. L. Degl'innocenti,et al.  On the solution of the radiative transfer equations for polarized radiation , 1985 .

[14]  M. Landolfi,et al.  Magneto-optical effects and the determination of vector magnetic fields from stokes profiles , 1982 .

[15]  S. Keil,et al.  Velocities in Solar Pores , 1999 .

[16]  Carolus J. Schrijver,et al.  Solar surface magnetism , 1994 .

[17]  Oskar Steiner,et al.  Dynamic Interaction of Convection with Magnetic Flux Sheets: First Results of a New MHD Code , 1994 .

[18]  W. Unno Line Formation of a Normal Zeeman Triplet , 1956 .