Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?

Academics can now use the web and the social websites to disseminate scholarly information in a variety of different ways. Although some scholars have taken advantage of these new online opportunities, it is not clear how widespread their uptake is or how much impact they can have. This study assesses the extent to which successful scientists have social web presences, focusing on one influential group: highly cited researchers working at European institutions. It also assesses the impact of these presences. We manually and systematically identified if the European highly cited researchers had profiles in Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic Search, Mendeley, Academia and LinkedIn or any content in SlideShare. We then used URL mentions and altmetric indicators to assess the impact of the web presences found. Although most of the scientists had an institutional website of some kind, few had created a profile in any social website investigated, and LinkedIn—the only non-academic site in the list—was the most popular. Scientists having one kind of social web profile were more likely to have another in many cases, especially in the life sciences and engineering. In most cases it was possible to estimate the relative impact of the profiles using a readily available statistic and there were disciplinary differences in the impact of the different kinds of profiles. Most social web profiles had some evidence of uptake, if not impact; nevertheless, the value of the indicators used is unclear.

[1]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles , 2006, Scientometrics.

[2]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Gang Wu,et al.  The impact of internet resources on scholarly communication: A citation analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[4]  Dario Taraborelli,et al.  Soft peer review. Social software and distributed scientific evaluation , 2008, COOP.

[5]  Stacy Konkiel,et al.  Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact , 2016 .

[6]  Flavio Figueiredo,et al.  Assessing the quality of textual features in social media , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  José Luis Ortega,et al.  Maps of the academic web in the European Higher Education Area — an exploration of visual web indicators , 2007, Scientometrics.

[8]  Alastair G. Smith Web links as research indicators: analogues of citations? , 2004, Inf. Res..

[9]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Web visibility of scholars in media and communication journals , 2012, Scientometrics.

[10]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  When do scientists “adopt” the Internet? Dimensions of connectivity in developing areas , 2005, Scientometrics.

[11]  B Walter,et al.  [In citation process]. , 2010, Der Radiologe.

[12]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A university-centred European Union link analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[15]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Scholarly publishing in the Internet age: a citation analysis of computer science literature , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country — the case of Israel , 2004, Scientometrics.

[18]  M. H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences , 2010 .

[19]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Google Scholar citations and Google Web-URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007 .

[20]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement , 2011, Scientometrics.

[21]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  A quasi-quantitative citation model , 1987, Scientometrics.

[22]  P. Jacsó As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases , 2005 .

[23]  Daril A. Vilhena Beyond bibliometrics : Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact , 2022 .

[24]  Panayiota Polydoratou,et al.  Exploring aspects of scientific publishing in astrophysics and cosmology: the views of scientists , 2007, MTSR.

[25]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance , 2001, Scientometrics.

[26]  A. Watson Comparing citations and downloads for individual articles , 2009 .

[27]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[29]  T. Brooks Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Interlinking between Asia-Pacific University Web sites , 2002, Scientometrics.

[31]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community , 2014, Scientometrics.

[32]  Tobias Siebenlist,et al.  Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[33]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[34]  K. Antelman Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? , 2004 .

[35]  Craig B. Stanford,et al.  Scopus , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[36]  Carlos Lizárraga-Celaya,et al.  Relevant Changes in Scientific Publishing in Mathematics and Physics , 2012 .

[37]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study , 2011, Electron. Libr..

[38]  Franz Barjak,et al.  The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web , 2010, First Monday.

[40]  Rafael Ruiz-Pérez,et al.  Google Scholar como herramienta para la evaluación científica. , 2009 .

[41]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Some measures for comparing citation databases , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[42]  Tim Brody,et al.  Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact: Research Articles , 2006 .

[43]  Johan Bollen,et al.  A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures , 2009, PloS one.

[44]  Paulo Veríssimo,et al.  Handling self-citations using Google Scholar , 2009 .

[45]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Web Impact Metrics for Research Assessment , 2014 .

[46]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Can web citations be a measure of impact? An investigation of journals in the life sciences , 2005, ASIST.

[47]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Social media use in the research workflow , 2011, Inf. Serv. Use.

[48]  Isidro F. Aguillo Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[49]  Franz Barjak,et al.  The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication: Research Articles , 2006 .

[50]  Isidro F. Aguillo,et al.  Can a personal website be useful as an information source to assess individual scientists? The case of European highly cited researchers , 2013, Scientometrics.

[51]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication , 1984 .

[53]  Euan A. Adie,et al.  Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article‐level discussion and metrics , 2013, Learn. Publ..

[54]  Jane M. Russell,et al.  Web visibility or wasted opportunity? Case studies from Mexican research institutes , 2012, Aslib Proc..

[55]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses , 2008 .

[56]  R. Procter,et al.  Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[57]  B. Cronin Norms and functions in citation: The view of journal editors and referees in psychology , 1982 .

[58]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Uncovering impacts: a case study in using altmetrics tools , 2013, SePublica@ESWC.

[59]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[60]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Do the Web sites of higher rated scholars have significantly more online impact? , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[61]  B. Björk,et al.  Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 , 2010, PloS one.

[62]  Liwen Vaughan,et al.  Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[63]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  National and international university departmental Web site interlinking , 2005, Scientometrics.

[64]  José Luis Ortega,et al.  Mapping world-class universities on the web , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[65]  A. Watson Comparing citations and downloads for individual articles at the Journal of Vision , 2009 .

[66]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century , 2012 .

[67]  Diego Ponte,et al.  Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination , 2011 .

[68]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[69]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Exploring the Virtual Space of Academia , 2012, COOP.

[70]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Academia.edu: Social network or Academic Network? , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[71]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Successful researchers publicizing research online: An outlink analysis of European highly cited scientists' personal websites , 2014, J. Documentation.

[72]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web , 2012, ArXiv.

[73]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A statistical analysis of the web presences of European life sciences research teams , 2008 .

[74]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science , 2010, Scientometrics.

[75]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  National and international university departmental Web site interlinking , 2005, Scientometrics.

[76]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[77]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information , 2012, PloS one.

[78]  Yehuda E. Kalay Impacts of New Media on Scholarly Publishing , 2008 .

[79]  Ziming Liu,et al.  Trends in transforming scholarly communication and their implications , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[80]  Kitty Dumont,et al.  Content analysis of the homepages of academic psychologists , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[81]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications , 2014, Scientometrics.

[82]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[83]  Dangzhi Zhao,et al.  Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science - A comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[84]  Lei Wang,et al.  Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.

[85]  Cecelia M. Brown The role of Web-based information in the scholarly communication of chemists: Citation and content analyses of American Chemical Society Journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[86]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities , 2009 .

[87]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[88]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages? , 2007 .