Monocular Advantage for Face Perception Implicates Subcortical Mechanisms in Adult Humans

The ability to recognize faces accurately and rapidly is an evolutionarily adaptive process. Most studies examining the neural correlates of face perception in adult humans have focused on a distributed cortical network of face-selective regions. There is, however, robust evidence from phylogenetic and ontogenetic studies that implicates subcortical structures, and recently, some investigations in adult humans indicate subcortical correlates of face perception as well. The questions addressed here are whether low-level subcortical mechanisms for face perception (in the absence of changes in expression) are conserved in human adults, and if so, what is the nature of these subcortical representations. In a series of four experiments, we presented pairs of images to the same or different eyes. Participants' performance demonstrated that subcortical mechanisms, indexed by monocular portions of the visual system, play a functional role in face perception. These mechanisms are sensitive to face-like configurations and afford a coarse representation of a face, comprised of primarily low spatial frequency information, which suffices for matching faces but not for more complex aspects of face perception such as sex differentiation. Importantly, these subcortical mechanisms are not implicated in the perception of other visual stimuli, such as cars or letter strings. These findings suggest a conservation of phylogenetically and ontogenetically lower-order systems in adult human face perception. The involvement of subcortical structures in face recognition provokes a reconsideration of current theories of face perception, which are reliant on cortical level processing, inasmuch as it bolsters the cross-species continuity of the biological system for face recognition.

[1]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Emotional perception: Correspondence of early and late event-related potentials with cortical and subcortical functional MRI , 2013, Biological Psychology.

[3]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Kurt E. Weaver,et al.  fMRI evidence of neural abnormalities in the subcortical face processing system in ASD , 2011, NeuroImage.

[5]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[6]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Spatial shifts of audio-visual interactions by perceptual learning are specific to the trained orientation and eye. , 2011, Seeing and perceiving.

[7]  P. Schiller,et al.  Composition of geniculostriate input ot superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[10]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  A monocular, unconscious form of visual attention. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[15]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs) , 2004, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[16]  Jumpei Matsumoto,et al.  Neuronal responses to face‐like stimuli in the monkey pulvinar , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  John Patrick Aggleton,et al.  The Amygdala : a functional analysis , 2000 .

[18]  P. Schiller,et al.  Functional specificity of lateral geniculate nucleus laminae of the rhesus monkey. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Schultz,et al.  Amygdala, pulvinar, and inferior parietal cortex contribute to early processing of faces without awareness , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Peter Mende-Siedlecki,et al.  Social judgments from faces , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  Elizabeth A. Tibbetts,et al.  Specialized Face Learning Is Associated with Individual Recognition in Paper Wasps , 2011, Science.

[22]  Romina Palermo,et al.  The Role of Spatial Attention in Nonconscious Processing , 2009, Psychological science.

[23]  Mark H. Johnson Subcortical face processing , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Punit Shah,et al.  Orienting Toward Face‐Like Stimuli in Early Childhood , 2015, Child development.

[25]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[26]  L. Benevento,et al.  The organization of projections of the retinorecipient and nonretinorecipient nuclei of the pretectal complex and layers of the superior colliculus to the lateral pulvinar and medial pulvinar in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  Keiko Usui,et al.  Temporal Profile of Amygdala Gamma Oscillations in Response to Faces , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  A. Ishai,et al.  The Gender of Face Stimuli is Represented in Multiple Regions in the Human Brain , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Ocular dominance in human V1 demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Functional MRI Reveals Compromised Neural Integrity of the Face Processing Network in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2009, Current Biology.

[31]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Impact of signal-to-noise on functional MRI of the human amygdala , 2001, Neuroreport.

[32]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Knowing with Which Eye We See: Utrocular Discrimination and Eye-Specific Signals in Human Visual Cortex , 2010, PloS one.

[33]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[35]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  The role of the amygdala in face perception and evaluation , 2011, Motivation and emotion.

[36]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Recognition memory of newly learned faces , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[37]  D. Jeffreys Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing , 1996 .

[38]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  The nature of face representations in subcortical regions , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Facial-Expression and Gaze-Selective Responses in the Monkey Amygdala , 2007, Current Biology.

[40]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[41]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Subcortical human face processing? Evidence from masked priming. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Peter Mende-Siedlecki,et al.  Robust Selectivity for Faces in the Human Amygdala in the Absence of Expressions , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  C Umiltà,et al.  Preferential orienting to faces in newborns: a temporal-nasal asymmetry. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Intrinsic Structure of Visual Exemplar and Category Representations in Macaque Brain , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Juraj Kukolja,et al.  Selective processing of social stimuli in the superficial amygdala , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[47]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[48]  A. Cowey,et al.  Nasal and temporal retinal ganglion cells projecting to the midbrain: Implications for “blindsight” , 1995, Neuroscience.

[49]  R. Blake,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a monocular visual cortex in stereoblind humans. , 1979, Science.

[50]  E. Tibbetts Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Temporal precedence of emotion over attention modulations in the lateral amygdala: Intracranial ERP evidence from a patient with temporal lobe epilepsy , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[52]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Neuronal responses in visual area V2 (V2) of macaque monkeys with strabismic amblyopia. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  F M de Monasterio,et al.  Arrangement of ocular dominance columns in human visual cortex. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[54]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Functional imaging of the monkey brain , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  P. Green Biology and Cognitive Development: the Case of Face Recognition, Mark H. Johnson, John Morton. Blackwell, Oxford (1991), x, +180. Price £35.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1992 .