Adaptive Discount Allocation in Social Networks

It has been reported that 40% of consumers will share an email offer with their friend and 28% of consumers will share deals via social media platforms. This motivates us to study the influence maximization discount allocation problem: given a social network and a limited marketing budget, which set of initial users should be selected to receive the discount, and how much should the discounts be worth? Our goal is to maximize the number of customers who finally adopt the target product. We investigate this problem under both non-adaptive and adaptive settings. In the first setting, we have to commit the set of initial users and corresponding discounts all at once in advance. In the latter case, given that an user has been offered a discount, we are able to know immediately her decision on whether or not to accept that discount, therefore, the decision process is performed in a sequential manner based on the feedback from previously selected users. We propose a simple greedy policy with an approximation ratio of (1-1/e) in non-adaptive setting. For the significantly more complex adaptive setting, we propose a series of adaptive policies with bounded approximation ratio in terms of expected utility.

[1]  Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi,et al.  Adaptive Budget Allocation for Maximizing Influence of Advertisements , 2016, IJCAI.

[2]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Optimizing Ad Allocation in Social Advertising , 2015, CIKM.

[3]  Wei Chen,et al.  Efficient influence maximization in social networks , 2009, KDD.

[4]  Mike Brennan,et al.  Constructing Demand Curves from Purchase Probability Data: An Application of the Juster Scale , 1995 .

[5]  Le Song,et al.  Multistage Campaigning in Social Networks , 2016, NIPS.

[6]  Xiaokui Xiao,et al.  Influence maximization: near-optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency , 2014, SIGMOD Conference.

[7]  Edith Cohen,et al.  Sketch-based Influence Maximization and Computation: Scaling up with Guarantees , 2014, CIKM.

[8]  Le Song,et al.  Shaping Social Activity by Incentivizing Users , 2014, NIPS.

[9]  Ashwin Lall,et al.  Social Network Monetization via Sponsored Viral Marketing , 2015, SIGMETRICS.

[10]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Adaptive Submodularity: Theory and Applications in Active Learning and Stochastic Optimization , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[11]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Adaptive Influence Maximization in Dynamic Social Networks , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[12]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[13]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  No Time to Observe: Adaptive Influence Maximization with Partial Feedback , 2016, IJCAI.

[14]  Euiho Suh,et al.  A prediction model for the purchase probability of anonymous customers to support real time web marketing: a case study , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Wei Chen,et al.  Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks , 2010, KDD.

[16]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Information and Influence Propagation in Social Networks , 2013, Synthesis Lectures on Data Management.

[17]  Jian Pei,et al.  Continuous Influence Maximization: What Discounts Should We Offer to Social Network Users? , 2016, SIGMOD Conference.

[18]  Maxim Sviridenko,et al.  A note on maximizing a submodular set function subject to a knapsack constraint , 2004, Oper. Res. Lett..

[19]  Nick Koudas,et al.  Information cascade at group scale , 2013, KDD.

[20]  Rong Zheng,et al.  On Budgeted Influence Maximization in Social Networks , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[22]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Locally Adaptive Optimization: Adaptive Seeding for Monotone Submodular Functions , 2016, SODA.

[23]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.