Orientation invariance in visual shape perception.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P Jolicoeur,et al. The linear separability effect in color visual search: Ruling out the additive color hypothesis , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[2] M J Tarr,et al. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3] D. Marr,et al. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[4] M. Eckstein. The Lower Visual Search Efficiency for Conjunctions Is Due to Noise and not Serial Attentional Processing , 1998 .
[5] Rodney A. Brooks,et al. Symbolic Reasoning Among 3-D Models and 2-D Images , 1981, Artif. Intell..
[6] Alex Pentland,et al. On describing complex surface shapes , 1986, Image Vis. Comput..
[7] Martin Arguin,et al. Conjunction and linear non-separability effects in visual shape encoding , 2000, Vision Research.
[8] Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al. Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination , 1998, Vision Research.
[9] A. Treisman,et al. Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] Irving Biederman,et al. Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons , 2002, Vision Research.
[11] Brian J Stankiewicz,et al. Empirical evidence for independent dimensions in the visual representation of three-dimensional shape. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] D. Foster,et al. Recognizing novel three–dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[13] A. J. Mistlin,et al. Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[14] Ravi S. Menon,et al. Differential Effects of Viewpoint on Object-Driven Activation in Dorsal and Ventral Streams , 2002, Neuron.
[15] J. Wolfe,et al. The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[16] N. Logothetis,et al. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.
[17] Zili Liu,et al. Dissociating stimulus information from internal representation—a case study in object recognition , 1999, Vision Research.
[18] W. Hayward. After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[19] M. Hasselmo,et al. Object-centered encoding by face-selective neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[20] W. Cowan,et al. Distractor Heterogeneity versus Linear Separability in Colour Visual Search , 1996 .
[21] Refractor. Vision , 2000, The Lancet.
[22] M. J. Tarr,et al. COMMENT ON: IS HUMAN OBJECT RECOGNITION BETTER DESCRIBED BY GEON STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS OR BY MULTIPLE VIEWS ? BY BARTRAM D.J. , 1995 .
[23] Martin Arguin,et al. Distinct Mechanisms Account for the Linear non–Separability and Conjunction Effects in Visual Shape Encoding , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[24] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[25] P. Jolicoeur. The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.
[26] S. Edelman,et al. Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.
[27] Stephen J. Johnston,et al. A polarity effect in misoriented object recognition: The role of polar features in the computation of orientation-invariant shape representations , 2006 .
[28] Paul E. Dux,et al. Viewpoint costs occur during consolidation: Evidence from the attentional blink , 2007, Cognition.
[29] E. Rolls,et al. View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.
[30] William B. Cowan,et al. Convex hull test of the linear separability hypothesis in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.
[31] Michael J. Tarr,et al. Article Commentary: Orientation-Dependent Mechanisms in Shape Recognition: Further Issues , 1991 .
[32] W. Hayward,et al. Viewpoint Dependence and Object Discriminability , 2000, Psychological science.
[33] Irving Biederman,et al. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.
[34] I. Biederman,et al. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.
[35] Allen M. Waxman,et al. Spreading activation layers, visual saccades, and invariant representations for neural pattern recognition systems , 1989, Neural Networks.
[36] Moshe Bar,et al. Viewpoint Dependency in Visual Object Recognition Does Not Necessarily Imply Viewer-Centered Representation , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[37] M. Tarr,et al. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.
[38] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[39] Gordon E. Legge,et al. The viewpoint complexity of an object-recognition task , 1998, Vision Research.
[40] R. Henson,et al. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[41] M. Tarr,et al. When does Human Object Recognition use a Viewer-Centered Reference Frame? , 1990 .
[42] I. Biederman,et al. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .
[43] J. Todd,et al. Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[44] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[45] Barr,et al. Superquadrics and Angle-Preserving Transformations , 1981, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
[46] Darren Burke,et al. Combining disparate views of objects: Viewpoint costs are reduced by stereopsis , 2005 .
[47] Michael D'Zmura,et al. Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.
[48] J. Cutting,et al. Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[49] W. Cowan,et al. Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.
[50] M. Tarr,et al. To What Extent Do Unique Parts Influence Recognition Across Changes in Viewpoint? , 1995 .
[51] A. Parker,et al. Integration of depth modules: Stereopsis and texture , 1993, Vision Research.
[52] Martin Arguin,et al. Shape Integration for Visual Object Recognition and Its Implication in Category-Specific Visual Agnosia , 1996 .
[53] J. Hummel,et al. An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description , 1996 .