Changing Relationships between Education and Fertility: A Study of Women and Men Born 1940 to 1964

Education and fertility (including childrearing) are foundational processes in societal metabolism, and the relationship between them can have profound, long-term effects on a variety of institutions, including the labor market, the family (especially care for the elderly), and educational institutions themselves. In postindustrial countries, conventional wisdom holds that there is a strong inverse relationship between education and completed fertility, but this has not been carefully examined in recent decades, and the topic has been almost completely neglected for men. In this article, we address these core questions and relations, drawing on the Norwegian population registers for cohorts born 1940 to 1964. Among women, the relationship between completed fertility and educational level attained at age 39 has become substantially less negative. In all cohorts, better-educated women have later first births and remain childless more often than do the less educated. The negative effect of education on higher-order birth rates net of the impact of later motherhood has, however, disappeared. Family-friendly ideologies and policies, including better access to high-quality daycare, are likely the engine behind this shift. Among men, a positive relationship has emerged: the better educated become fathers later than others, but fewer remain childless, and there has been an increasingly stimulating effect of education on second- and third-birth rates. We discuss these sex differences in light of the persistent differences between mothers' and fathers' roles.

[1]  J. Forrest,et al.  Intention status of U.S. births in 1988: differences by mothers' socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. , 1995, Family planning perspectives.

[2]  D. Macunovich Relative Income and Price of Time: Exploring their effcts on U.S. Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation, 1963-1993 , 1996 .

[3]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Who Marries Whom , 2003 .

[4]  M. Rønsen Fertility and family policy in Norway - A reflection on trends and possible connections , 2004 .

[5]  C. Bourdais,et al.  Where Have All The Children Gone? Comparing Mothers’ and Fathers’ Declarations in Retrospective Surveys , 1999 .

[6]  M. Lino Expenditures on Children by Families, 2007 , 2008 .

[7]  M. Planck Gender Equality and Fertility in Sweden: A Study on the Impact of the Father's Uptake of Parental Leave on Continued Childbearing , 2005 .

[8]  N. Ryder The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. , 1965, American sociological review.

[9]  M. Kreyenfeld Time Squeeze, Partner Effect or Self-Selection? , 2002 .

[10]  J. Caldwell,et al.  Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: A search for commonalities , 2003, Population studies.

[11]  Jennifer E. Swanberg,et al.  A Question of Justice , 2005 .

[12]  K. Gorey,et al.  Infant Simulator Lifespace Intervention: Pilot Investigation of an Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program , 1997 .

[13]  R. Rindfuss,et al.  The Changing Institutional Context of Low Fertility , 2003 .

[14]  M. Kreyenfeld Time-Squeeze, Partner Effect or Self-Selection? An Investigation into the Positive Effect of Women’s Education on Second Birth Risks in West Germany , 2002 .

[15]  J. Huber Macro-Micro Links in Gender Stratification: 1989 Presidential Address , 1990 .

[16]  M. Greene,et al.  Absent and Problematic Men: Demographic Accounts of Male Reproductive Roles , 1997 .

[17]  Katja Köppen Second births in western Germany and France , 2006 .

[18]  Ron Brusius What's happening to the family? , 1978 .

[19]  S. Hofferth,et al.  The effects of early childbearing on schooling over time. , 2001, Family planning perspectives.

[20]  F. Furstenberg,et al.  Are Parents Investing Less Time in Children? Trends in Selected Industrialized Countries , 2004 .

[21]  J. Arendt Does Education cause better Health? A Panel Data Analysis Using School Reforms for Identification , 2005 .

[22]  Ø. Kravdal The High Fertility of College Educated Women in Norway: An Artefact of the 'Piecemeal Approach' , 2001 .

[23]  L. Oláh Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary , 2003 .

[24]  H. Stigum,et al.  Contraception and STD protection among urban Norwegians , 2002 .

[25]  Ragni Hege Kitterød Utdanning og ulikhet , 2002 .

[26]  F. Billari,et al.  The Emergence of Lowest‐Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s , 2002 .

[27]  R. Rosenfeld Womens work histories. , 1996 .

[28]  A. C. Kerckhoff Institutional Arrangements and Stratification Processes in Industrial Societies , 1995 .

[29]  Ø. Kravdal Is the Previously Reported Increase in Second- and Higher-order Birth Rates in Norway and Sweden from the mid-1970s Real or a Result of Inadequate Estimation Methods? , 2002 .

[30]  J. Ermisch Purchased child care, optimal family size and mother's employment Theory and econometric analysis , 1988, Journal of population economics.

[31]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  Child Endowments and the Quantity and Quality of Children , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  C. Stevens-Simon,et al.  Does Mothering a Doll Change Teens' Thoughts About Pregnancy? , 2000, Pediatrics.

[33]  Andrew M. Penner,et al.  From Motherhood Penalties to Fatherhood Premia: The New Challenge for Family Policy , 2007 .

[34]  R. Lesthaeghe,et al.  Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change , 1988 .

[35]  A. Gauthier,et al.  Family Benefits and Fertility: An Econometric Analysis , 1997 .

[36]  R. Rindfuss,et al.  Women work and children: behavioral and attitudinal change in the United States. , 1996 .

[37]  Lars Østby The diffusion of modern contraception in norway and its consequences for the fertility pattern , 1989, European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie.

[38]  M. Planck An Artefact of the Separate Modelling of Each Parity Transition , 2001 .

[39]  G. Birkelund,et al.  Who Marries Whom? Educational Homogamy in Norway. , 2003 .

[40]  Scott Johnson,et al.  Husbands and wives , 1993 .

[41]  H. Joshi Production, Reproduction, and Education: Women, Children, and Work in a British Perspective , 2002 .

[42]  S. Short,et al.  Second Births and the Second Shift: A Research Note on Gender Equity and Fertility , 2004 .

[43]  V. Oppenheimer Womens rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. , 1994 .

[44]  Paula England,et al.  The Wage Penalty for Motherhood , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[45]  C. Bledsoe,et al.  Fertility and the Male Life-Cycle in the Era of Fertility Decline , 2000 .

[46]  S. Hoffman A Treatise on the Family , 2000 .

[47]  Ø. Kravdal Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation , 1999 .

[48]  G. Santow,et al.  Deferment of the First Birth and Fluctuating Fertility in Sweden , 2001 .

[49]  Maria Stanfors,et al.  Education, Work and Parenthood: The Experience of Young Men and Women in Post-War Sweden , 2006 .

[50]  S. Henshaw Unintended pregnancy in the United States. , 1998, Family planning perspectives.

[51]  R. Forste Where are All the Men? , 2002 .

[52]  Robert J. Willis,et al.  A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[53]  A. Prskawetz,et al.  Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effect of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria, 1975-96 , 2001 .

[54]  Ø. Kravdal The Importance of Economic Activity, Economic Potential and Economic Resources for the Timing of First Births in Norway , 1994 .

[55]  E. Klijzing Are there unmet family planning needs in Europe? , 2000, Family planning perspectives.

[56]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor , 2000 .

[57]  M. Corijn,et al.  Who, What, Where, and When? Specifying the Impact of Educational Attainment and Labour Force Participation on Family Formation , 1999, European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie.

[58]  de Ng Dick Bruijn,et al.  A sorting machine , 1983 .

[59]  F. Goldscheider,et al.  Fertility and commitment: bringing men back in. , 1996 .

[60]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[61]  J. Hoem,et al.  The Impact of Women's Employment on Second and Third Births in Modern Sweden , 1989 .

[62]  A. Monnier,et al.  The demographic situation of Europe and the developed countries overseas: an annual report. , 1995, Population. English selection.

[63]  Kellie J. Hagewen,et al.  Intended and Ideal Family Size in the United States, 1970-2002. , 2005, Population and development review.

[64]  S. Low,et al.  An economic analysis of the timing of childbirth , 1984 .

[65]  M. Sundström,et al.  Family Policy and After-Birth Employment Among New Mothers – A Comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden , 2002 .

[66]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[67]  L. Waite,et al.  The Importance of Child-Care Characteristics to Choice of Care , 1996 .

[68]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Reevaluating the costs of teenage childbearing. , 1993, Demography.

[69]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[70]  B. Hoem The social meaning of the age at second birth for third-birth fertility: a methodological note on the need to sometimes respectify an intermediate variable , 1996 .

[71]  M. P. Ward,et al.  The Emergence of Countercyclical U.S. Fertility , 1979 .

[72]  H. Joshi,et al.  Forgone income and motherhood: What do recent British data tell u? , 2000, Population studies.

[73]  Ragni Hege Kitterød,et al.  Making up for mothers’ employed working hours? , 2006 .