Negative and positive templates: Two forms of cued attentional control

[1]  Ziyao Zhang,et al.  Assessing recoding accounts of negative attentional templates using behavior and eye tracking. , 2022, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance , 2022, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Kerzel,et al.  Guidance of visual search by negative attentional templates depends on task demands. , 2022, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  No evidence for proactive suppression of explicitly cued distractor features , 2022, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[5]  Robert G. Alexander,et al.  Negative cues minimize visual search specificity effects , 2022, Vision Research.

[6]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search. , 2021, Psychological science.

[7]  J. Geng,et al.  Unresolved issues in distractor suppression: Proactive and reactive mechanisms, implicit learning, and naturalistic distraction , 2021, Visual Cognition.

[8]  Matthew D. Weaver,et al.  Strategic Distractor Suppression Improves Selective Control in Human Vision , 2021, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Eimer,et al.  The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search , 2020, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[10]  J. Pratt,et al.  Directed avoidance and its effect on visual working memory , 2020, Cognition.

[11]  J. Geng,et al.  Passive exposure attenuates distraction during visual search. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Probing early attention following negative and positive templates , 2019, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[13]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates , 2020, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  H. Slagter,et al.  Inhibition in selective attention , 2019, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction , 2019, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Distractor Ignoring: Strategies, Learning, and Passive Filtering , 2019, Current directions in psychological science.

[17]  G. Woodman,et al.  What not to look for: electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive template , 2019, Journal of Vision.

[18]  Jun I Kawahara,et al.  Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect , 2019, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[19]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression , 2019, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[20]  H. Müller,et al.  Feature guidance by negative attentional templates depends on search difficulty , 2019, Visual Cognition.

[21]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Getting rid of visual distractors: the why, when, how, and where. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[22]  S. Vecera,et al.  Cued distractor rejection disrupts learned distractor rejection , 2019, Visual Cognition.

[23]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Location-based explanations do not account for active attentional suppression , 2019, Visual Cognition.

[24]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Evidence for Second-Order Singleton Suppression Based on Probabilistic Expectations , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Shaun P. Vecera,et al.  Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search , 2018, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[26]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Desensitizing the Attention System to Distraction While Idling: A New Latent Learning Phenomenon in the Visual Attention Domain , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  No evidence for enhanced distractor template representation in early visual cortex , 2018, Cortex.

[28]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  The Architecture of Interaction Between Visual Working Memory and Visual Attention , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Daniel B. Vatterott,et al.  Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[30]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Whatever You Do, Don’t Look at the . . .: Evaluating Guidance by an Exclusionary Attentional Template , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Briana L. Kennedy,et al.  Proactive Deprioritization of Emotional Distractors Enhances Target Perception , 2017, Emotion.

[34]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Cortical evidence for negative search templates , 2017 .

[35]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The Control of Single-color and Multiple-color Visual Search by Attentional Templates in Working Memory and in Long-term Memory , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[37]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Global Enhancement but Local Suppression in Feature-based Attention , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  D. Grant,et al.  The effects of self-focus on attentional biases in social anxiety:An ERP study , 2016, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[39]  F. Yang,et al.  Reward association facilitates distractor suppression in human visual search , 2016, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  Howard E Egeth,et al.  Taming the White Bear , 2016, Psychological science.

[41]  Ben M. Crittenden,et al.  Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al.  Gaze in Visual Search Is Guided More Efficiently by Positive Cues than by Negative Cues , 2015, PloS one.

[43]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  No templates for rejection: a failure to configure attention to ignore task-irrelevant features , 2015 .

[44]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs , 2015, Psychological science.

[45]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Elicits Surround Suppression in Feature Space , 2014, Current Biology.

[47]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Attentional Mechanisms of Distractor Suppression , 2014 .

[48]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Global Facilitation of Attended Features Is Obligatory and Restricts Divided Attention , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention? , 2013, Journal of vision.

[50]  O. Jensen,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Serve to Protect Working Memory Maintenance against Anticipated Distracters , 2012, Current Biology.

[51]  Katharina N. Seidl,et al.  Neural Evidence for Distracter Suppression during Visual Search in Real-World Scenes , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Howard E Egeth,et al.  The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Daniel B. Vatterott,et al.  Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  Jason T. Arita,et al.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory , 2011, Visual cognition.

[56]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not , 2022 .

[57]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  A. Aron.  From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[59]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[60]  Jason T. Arita,et al.  Direct Electrophysiological Measurement of Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory , 2011, Psychological science.

[61]  S. Andersen,et al.  Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Joy J Geng,et al.  Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[63]  Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.  Remembered but Unused: The Accessory Items in Working Memory that Do Not Guide Attention , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Attention Facilitates Multiple Stimulus Features in Parallel in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[66]  E. Vogel,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE How to Exploit Diversity for Scientific Gain Using Individual Differences to Constrain Cognitive Theory , 2022 .

[67]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[69]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[70]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[71]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[72]  N. Clark,et al.  Direct Evidence , 1934 .

[73]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[74]  Wayne D. Gray.  Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems , 2007, Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures.

[75]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[76]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[77]  S. Tipper,et al.  A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. , 1994 .