Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes

Efforts to systematically integrate graduate attributes across university curricula have relied on academic staff acceptance and ability to translate top-down policy into teaching practice. The literature and anecdotal reports over the past two decades show limited success in the area using this approach. Why is this so? Teaching staff across 16 Australian universities were surveyed, as part of an Australian Learning and Teaching Council-funded grant, regarding their beliefs about graduate attributes and their willingness and confidence to teach and assess them. The study found that although 73% of academic staff surveyed believed graduate attributes were important, there was a substantial difference between beliefs and actual emphasis reported in practice. We consider the major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes, the implications for policy development and implementation, and propose a rethink in relation to how to work towards improved graduate attribute outcomes in universities.

[1]  J. Kotter,et al.  A sense of urgency. , 1985, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[2]  Wendy Green,et al.  Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes? , 2009 .

[3]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Identifying academics' orientations to assessment practice , 2002 .

[4]  Gordon Suddaby,et al.  Impact of student support services and academic development programmes on student outcomes in undergraduate tertiary study: a synthesis of the research , 2005 .

[5]  J. W. Null.  Is There a Future for the Teaching Profession? , 2009 .

[6]  J. Newton,et al.  Implementing an Institution-wide Learning and Teaching Strategy: Lessons in managing change , 2003 .

[7]  Janice Orrell,et al.  Feedback on learning achievement: rhetoric and reality , 2006 .

[8]  Barbara de la Harpe,et al.  Assessing graduate attributes: Engaging academic staff and their students , 2008 .

[9]  P. Kamvounias,et al.  Bridging the implementation gap: a teacher‐as‐learner approach to teaching and learning policy , 2008 .

[10]  J. Kotter,et al.  The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations , 2002 .

[11]  P. Candy,et al.  Ivory Tower to Concrete Jungle: The Difficult Transition from the Academy to the Workplace as Learning Environments. , 1991 .

[12]  S. Baumann.  Five Minds for the Future , 2009 .

[13]  Y. Lee.  The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment , 2000 .

[14]  P. Petegem,et al.  Instructional development for teachers in higher education: impact on teaching approach , 2010 .

[15]  Ellen Jansen.  Improving student learning. Theory and practice- 10 years on , 2003 .

[16]  Barbara de la Harpe,et al.  Lessons learned from three projects to design learning environments that support 'generic' skill development , 2012 .

[17]  B De La Harpe,et al.  Are confidence and willingness the keys to the assessment of graduate attributes , 2009 .

[18]  Anna Jones.  Generic attributes as espoused theory: the importance of context , 2009 .

[19]  H. Coates,et al.  Learning leaders in times of change: Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education , 2008 .

[20]  John Medlin,et al.  Using diverse professional teams and a graduate qualities framework to develop generic skills within a commerce degree , 2003 .

[21]  D. Dolmans,et al.  A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8 , 2006, Medical teacher.

[22]  G. Christiaens,et al.  Leading change , 2018, Leadership Transitions in Universities.

[23]  Lee Harvey,et al.  Embedding and integrating employability , 2005 .

[24]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[25]  S. Barrie.  Understanding What We Mean by the Generic Attributes of Graduates , 2006 .

[26]  John Jones,et al.  Academic staff views of quality systems for teaching and learning: a Hong Kong case study , 2005 .

[27]  Gay Crebert,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH INTO GENERIC SKILLS AND GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES : CONSTRAINTS AND DILEMMAS , 2002 .

[28]  L. Harvey,et al.  Graduate attributes and their development , 2005 .

[29]  Precision Consultancy.  Graduate employability skills , 2007 .

[30]  B. Chalkley.  Geography staff placements: nice work? , 1995 .

[31]  M. Prosser,et al.  The differential impact of UK accredited teaching development programmes on academics’ approaches to teaching , 2008 .

[32]  R. Kane,et al.  Telling Half the Story: A Critical Review of Research on the Teaching Beliefs and Practices of University Academics , 2002 .

[33]  Anne Nevgi,et al.  The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education , 2007 .

[34]  J. Tagg.  The learning paradigm college , 2003 .

[35]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[36]  Paul R. Trowler,et al.  Compulsory Higher Education Teacher Training: Joined‐up policies, institutional architectures and enhancement cultures , 2005 .