When explanations compete: the role of explanatory coherence on judgements of likelihood
暂无分享，去创建一个
[1] Charles S. Peirce,et al. Reasoning and the Logic of Things. The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898 , 1994 .
[2] S. Sloman. Feature-Based Induction , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[3] Edward E. Smith,et al. Category-Based Induction , 1990 .
[4] Timothy D. Wilson,et al. Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: the Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why we Feel the Way we Do , 1989 .
[5] N. Pennington,et al. Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment , 1988 .
[6] How “Naive” Is the Naive Attributor? Discounting and Augmentation in Attitude Attribution , 1987 .
[7] Daniel N. Osherson,et al. Some origins of belief , 1986, Cognition.
[8] S. Carey. Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .
[9] M. Lepper,et al. Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[10] Baruch Fischhoff,et al. Strategies of information search in causal analysis , 1982 .
[11] B. Fischhoff,et al. Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .
[12] Mark R. Lepper,et al. Social explanation and social expectation: Effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood. , 1977 .
[13] B. Fischhoff,et al. On the Psychology of Experimental Surprises. , 1977 .
[14] L. Rips. Inductive judgments about natural categories. , 1975 .
[15] H. Kelley. The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .