One robot doesn’t fit all: aligning social robot appearance and job suitability from a Middle Eastern perspective

Social robots are expected to take over a significant number of jobs in the coming decades. The present research provides the first systematic evaluation of occupation suitability of existing social robots based on user perception derived classification of them. The study was conducted in the Middle East since the views of this region are rarely considered in human–robot interaction research, although the region is poised to increasingly adopt the use of robots. Laboratory-based experimental data revealed that a robot’s appearance plays an important role in the perception of its capabilities and preference for it to perform a particular job. Participants showed a preference for machine-like robots to perform dull and dirty occupations and humanoids, but not androids, to perform jobs requiring extensive social interaction with humans. However, other aspects of appearance than morphology determine whether a robot is preferred for a job irrespective of its perceived capability to do it.

[1]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  M. Joosse,et al.  Cultural differences in how an engagement-seeking robot should approach a group of people , 2014, CABS '14.

[3]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Anthropomorphic design for an interactive urban robot: the right design approach , 2011, HRI '11.

[4]  Christophe Ley,et al.  Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median , 2013 .

[5]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Anticipating our future robot society: The evaluation of future robot applications from a user's perspective , 2016, RO-MAN.

[8]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Who is appropriate? A robot, human and mascot perform three troublesome tasks , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[9]  Yusuf Al-Qaradawi,et al.  The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam: Al-Halal Wal-haram Fil Islam , 1980 .

[10]  Fumihide Tanaka,et al.  Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  W. Bijker.  Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism , 1993 .

[12]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[13]  KandaTakayuki,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006 .

[14]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[16]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey , 2005 .

[17]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[18]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2015 .

[19]  A. Moniz,et al.  Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry , 2016 .

[20]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[21]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Ibn Sina Steps Out: Exploring Arabic Attitudes Toward Humanoid Robots , 2010 .

[22]  Maria Paola Paladino,et al.  Validation of the psychological scale for general impressions of humanoids in an Italian sample , 2014 .

[23]  Maha Salem,et al.  Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of Politeness and Culture on Robot Acceptance and Anthropomorphization , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[24]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[25]  Emilia I. Barakova,et al.  Effects of robots’ intonation and bodily appearance on robot-mediated communicative treatment outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder , 2018, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[26]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  The evaluation of different roles for domestic social robots , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[27]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[28]  Min-Gyu Kim,et al.  Pepper or Roomba? Effective Robot Design Type Based on Cultural Analysis between Korean and Japanese Users , 2016 .

[29]  Joo-Young Jung,et al.  The influence of social , 2014 .

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Transfer of Information Technology to the Arab World: A Test of Cultural Influence Modeling , 2001, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[31]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human–Robot Interaction , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[32]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Dimensions of Anthropomorphism : From Humanness to Humanlikeness , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[33]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[34]  N. Ambady,et al.  Motions of the Hand Expose the Partial and Parallel Activation of Stereotypes , 2009, Psychological science.

[35]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Cultural Differences in Perception and Attitude towards Robots , 2014 .

[36]  Lambèr M. M. Royakkers,et al.  A Literature Review on New Robotics: Automation from Love to War , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[37]  A. Billard,et al.  Chapter 18 Games Children with Autism Can Play With Robota , a Humanoid Robotic Doll , 1995 .

[38]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[39]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Escaping from Children’s Abuse of Social Robots , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[40]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  An Architecture for Telenoid Robot as Empathic Conversational Android Companion for Elderly People , 2014, IAS.

[41]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Sacrifice One For the Good of Many? People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[42]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[43]  Karsten Berns,et al.  Intelligent Autonomous Systems 13 - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference IAS-13, Padova, Italy, July 15-18, 2014 , 2016, IAS.

[44]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Communication Robots in Real Environments , 2007 .

[45]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Who will be the customer?: a social robot that anticipates people's behavior from their trajectories , 2008, UbiComp.

[46]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[47]  James E. Katz,et al.  Attitudes towards robots suitability for various jobs as affected robot appearance , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[48]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[49]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Looking Good? Appearance Preferences and Robot Personality Inferences at Zero Acquaintance , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics.

[50]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[51]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[52]  Jonathan B Freeman,et al.  MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[53]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  What People Assume about Humanoid and Animal-Type Robots: Cross-Cultural Analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States , 2008, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[54]  Lars Oestreicher,et al.  User Expectations on Human-Robot Co-operation , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[55]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[56]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[57]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  The Influence of Social Presence on Acceptance of an Assistive Social Robot and Screen Agent by Elderly Users , 2009 .

[58]  N. Haslam,et al.  Attributing and denying humanness to others , 2008 .

[59]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Should robots or people do these jobs? A survey of robotics experts and non-experts about which jobs robots should do , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[60]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Feminizing Robots: User Responses to Gender Cues on Robot Body and Screen , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[61]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: why do women like women more than men like men? , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Robots in Society, Society in Robots , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[63]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research , 2016 .

[64]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[65]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Influences of concerns toward emotional interaction into social acceptability of robots , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[66]  Abdulkafi Albirini,et al.  Teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[67]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Universal Access and Assistive Technology , 2002 .