Contribution of re-regulation reservoirs considering pumping capability to environmentally friendly hydropower operation

Environmental constraints imposed on hydropower operation are usually given in the form of minimum environmental flows and maximum and minimum rates of change of flows, or ramp rates. One solution proposed to mitigate the environmental impact caused by the flows discharged by a hydropower plant while reducing the economic impact of the above-mentioned constraints consists in building a re-regulation reservoir, or afterbay, downstream of the power plant. Adding pumping capability between the re-regulation reservoir and the main one could contribute both to reducing the size of the re-regulation reservoir, with the consequent environmental improvement, and to improving the economic feasibility of the project, always fulfilling the environmental constraints imposed to hydropower operation. The objective of this paper is studying the contribution of a re-regulation reservoir to fulfilling the environmental constraints while reducing the economic impact of said constraints. For that purpose, a revenue-driven optimization model based on mixed integer linear programming is used. Additionally, the advantages of adding pumping capability are analysed. In order to illustrate the applicability of the methodology, a case study based on a real hydropower plant is presented.

[1]  David A. Harpman Assessing the Short-Run Economic Cost of Environmental Constraints on Hydropower Operations at Glen Canyon Dam , 1999 .

[2]  Shuai Lu,et al.  Unit commitment considering generation flexibility and environmental constraints , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[3]  J. J. S. Donaire,et al.  Aspectos geográficos de las distribuciones estadísticas ajustadas a las series temporales rellenadas de totales anuales de precipitación española , 2001 .

[4]  J.P.S. Catalão,et al.  Hydro energy systems management in Portugal: Profit-based evaluation of a mixed-integer nonlinear ap , 2011 .

[5]  J. Waight,et al.  Experiences with Mixed Integer Linear Programming-Based Approaches in Short-Term Hydro Scheduling , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[6]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Self-Scheduling of a Hydro Producer in a Pool-Based Electricity Market , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[7]  M. Insley,et al.  On the economics of ramping rate restrictions at hydro power plants: Balancing profitability and environmental costs☆ , 2013 .

[8]  Jay R. Lund,et al.  Modeling California's high‐elevation hydropower systems in energy units , 2009 .

[9]  A. Borghetti,et al.  An MILP Approach for Short-Term Hydro Scheduling and Unit Commitment With Head-Dependent Reservoir , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  G. A. Thomas,et al.  Restoring Environmental Flows by Modifying Dam Operations , 2007 .

[11]  Sajad Jafari,et al.  Pumped-storage unit commitment with considerations for energy demand, economics, and environmental constraints , 2010 .

[12]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Environmental Constraints on Hydropower: An Ex Post Benefit-Cost Analysis of Dam Relicensing in Michigan , 2006, Land Economics.

[13]  M. Olivares Optimal Hydropower Reservoir Operation with Environmental Requirements , 2008 .

[14]  M.E.P. Maceira,et al.  A Four-Dimensional Model of Hydro Generation for the Short-Term Hydrothermal Dispatch Problem Considering Head and Spillage Effects , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Juan I. Pérez-Díaz,et al.  Optimal short-term operation schedule of a hydropower plant in a competitive electricity market , 2010 .

[16]  Juan I. Pérez-Díaz,et al.  Assessment of the economic impact of environmental constraints on short-term hydropower plant operation , 2010 .

[17]  A.M. Gonzalez,et al.  Stochastic Joint Optimization of Wind Generation and Pumped-Storage Units in an Electricity Market , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.