Extracting information on surface properties from bidirectional reflectance measurements

The retrieval of surface parameters from remotely sensed data is of prime interest for the estimation of surface properties of various planets in the solar system, including the Earth. Bidirectional reflectance measurements taken over natural surfaces in visible and near-infrared spectral bands represent one data set from which these surface properties could be estimated. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to have both physical models predicting the bidirectional reflectance field as a function of the relevant surface parameters, and numerical procedures allowing the inversion of these models using a limited sampling of the bidirectional reflectance field. Given that theoretical models of the bidirectional reflectance have been published (Hapke, 1981, 1984, 1986; Verstraete et al., 1990) and that numerical procedures are available (Pinty et al., 1990), this paper focuses on the errors and uncertainties in the retrieved parameters which may arise because of (1) the weaknesses in our theoretical understanding and representation of the surface radiation transfer and (2) the errors in the bidirectional reflectance data. For instance, it is shown that the addition a posteriori of an amplitude parameter in the function accounting for the opposition effect can drastically modify the retrieved values of the optical and morphological parameters of the surface. The consequences of uncertainties in the reflectance data are also investigated, and the redistribution, by the inversion procedure, of such uncertainties on the retrieved parameters is discussed. Finally, synthetic reflectance data contaminated by a known random noise are used to examine the numerical stability of the retrieval and the compatibility between the models.

[1]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A physical model of the bidirectional reflectance of vegetation canopies: 2. Inversion and validation , 1990 .

[2]  P. Woessner A study of the polarization of light scattered by vegetation. M.S. Thesis , 1985 .

[3]  A. Marshak,et al.  Calculation of canopy bidirectional reflectance using the Monte Carlo method , 1988 .

[4]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy , 1984 .

[5]  P. J. Camillo,et al.  A canopy reflectance model based on an analytical solution to the multiple scattering equation , 1987 .

[6]  Kari Lumme,et al.  Radiative transfer in the surfaces of atmosphereless bodies , 1981 .

[7]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A physical model for predicting bidirectional reflectances over bare soil , 1989 .

[8]  Joseph Veverka,et al.  Photometric properties of lunar terrains derived from Hapke's equation , 1987 .

[9]  Bruce Hapke,et al.  Fitting theoretical photometric functions to asteroid phase curves , 1989 .

[10]  L. Biehl,et al.  Variation in spectral response of soybeans with respect to illumination, view, and canopy geometry , 1984 .

[11]  L. C. Henyey,et al.  Diffuse radiation in the Galaxy , 1940 .

[12]  R. Dickinson Land Surface Processes and Climate—Surface Albedos and Energy Balance , 1983 .

[13]  Paul N. Woessner,et al.  Polarization of light scattered by clover , 1987 .

[14]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Relating surface albedos in GCM to remotely sensed data , 1990 .

[15]  J. Goguen A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of the Photometric Functions of Particulate Surfaces. , 1981 .

[16]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy: 4. The extinction coefficient and the opposition effect , 1986 .

[17]  M. Verstraete Radiation transfer in plant canopies - Transmission of direct solar radiation and the role of leaf orientation , 1987 .

[18]  P. Sellers Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration , 1985 .

[19]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy: 1. Theory , 1981 .

[20]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  The bare bones of leaf-angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange , 1988 .

[21]  B. Pinty,et al.  A physical model of the bidirectional reflectance of vegetation canopies , 1990 .