CATEGORIZING POLYTECHNIC ENGINEERING LEARNING ACTIVITIES BASED ON STUDENTS' LEARNING STYLE

Learning style is expressed as the way a learner approaches a process of learning and how he accrues the content of learning. This normally involves interactions between teachers, students and teaching materials. Knowing appropriate students’ learning style can improve students’ performance and increase student involvement in teaching and learning. A case study was conducted involving 30 first year students from the Department of Mechanical Engineering in an AutoCAD course at Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah Polytechnic (POLIMAS), Kedah. An analysis was conducted on a set of questionnaire to obtain the mean value, standard deviation and percentages. Based on Honey and Mumford’s model, the findings revealed that the students’ learning style was inclined towards activist and pragmatist typology. This study provides information necessary to help in the process of deciding the suitable learning strategy to be applied to students at the polytechnic. In general, these findings help the instructor at the polytechnic to plan, prepare and apply appropriate materials for meaningful teaching and learning.

[1]  A. Mumford Learning styles and mentoring , 1995 .

[2]  W. M. Reed,et al.  The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment , 1994 .

[3]  D. Korten Community Organization and Rural Development : A Learning Process Approach , 1980 .

[4]  Christoph Barmeyer,et al.  Learning styles and their impact on cross-cultural training: An international comparison in France, Germany and Quebec , 2004 .

[5]  Saïd Assar,et al.  Student Learning Styles Adaptation Method Based on Teaching Strategies and Electronic Media , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[6]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[7]  P. Borthwick,et al.  Matching Styles: A Historical Look. , 1984 .

[8]  K. Dunn,et al.  Learning Styles/Teaching Styles: Should They ... Can They ... Be Matched?. , 1979 .

[9]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Justifying policy arguments: Criteria for practical discourse , 1990 .

[10]  R. Oxford,et al.  A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning 1 1 The content of this artic , 2003 .

[11]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Examining Information Processing on the World Wide Web Using Think Aloud Protocols , 2000 .

[12]  Alan Mumford,et al.  Effective learners in action learning sets , 1996 .

[13]  L. Curry Cognitive and learning styles in medical education. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  R. Felder,et al.  Understanding Student Differences , 2005 .

[15]  Enrique Alfonseca,et al.  The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: a case study , 2006, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[16]  T. C. Bello COMPARISON OF ELEVEN MAJOR LEARNING STYLES MODELS: VARIABLES, APPROPRIATE POPULATIONS, VALIDITY OF INSTRUMENTATION, AND THE RESEARCH BEHIND THEM , 1990 .