Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in children – long-term outcomes, how long follow up is necessary?

Introduction Pyeloplasty is commonly conducted in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Standard post-operational procedure involves only a short period of time after the surgery. What is the real number of complications, including those in the long-term? What is the function of the operated kidney? The aims of this study are to assess the effectiveness of pyeloplasty and to assess the suitability of conducting long term follow-up after pyeloplasty. Material and methods 35 of 137 patients after open pyeloplasty between 1992–2006 responded to the invitation and returned for a control appointment. The median age was 8 years (range 1 month – 19 years). In 26 kidney units the disease proceeded with symptoms and in 10 cases it proceeded without symptoms. The predominant symptom was abdominal pain (n = 21). In each child both the control ultrasound and the diuretic renal scintigraphy of the kidneys were conducted. Results Regression of symptoms after the operation was obtained in 19 kidney units (73%). Improvement in scintigraphy was observed in 23 kidney units (82.1%), improvement in ultrasound was obtained in 32 (91%) kidney units. Complications which required surgical intervention occurred in 4 (11.1%) patients. One patient required operative removal of a pyelostomy tube, 2 patients (11.1%) required repeated pyleoplasty (23 and 27 months after the operation), one child required nephrectomy due to nephrogenic arterial hypertension (after 4 years). Conclusions Statistically, there are improvements of scintigraphic function of the kidney, improvements in ultrasound examinations, and the remission of symptoms after pyeoplasty. Most complications occur within 2 years after the surgery. Long-term follow up should be continued.

[1]  S. Nakada,et al.  Management of Upper Urinary Tract Obstruction , 2012 .

[2]  O. Köse,et al.  Short stay pyeloplasty with transverse dorsal lumbotomy incision: our 10-year experience. , 2009, Urology.

[3]  W. Roberts,et al.  Late failures after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. , 2008, Urology.

[4]  G. Chow,et al.  First Prize: Long-Term Success of Antegrade Endopyelotomy Compared with Pyeloplasty at a Single Institution , 2006 .

[5]  O. Göǧüs,et al.  Long-Term Results of Anderson-Hynes Pyeloplasty in 180 Adults in the Era of Endourologic Procedures , 2004, Urologia Internationalis.

[6]  M. Leonard,et al.  Long-term followup of pediatric dismembered pyeloplasty: how long is long enough? , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[7]  P. Cartwright,et al.  Apparent unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the newborn: expectations for resolution. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[8]  S. Koff Neonatal management of unilateral hydronephrosis. Role for delayed intervention. , 1998, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[9]  N. Kekre,et al.  Is open pyeloplasty still justified? , 1997, British journal of urology.

[10]  C. Amling,et al.  Renal ultrasound changes after pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term outcome in 47 renal units. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[11]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Pelvic hydronephrosis in children: a review of 219 personal cases. , 1977, The Journal of urology.

[12]  K. Barber Obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction. , 1951, The Proceedings of the Institute of Medicine of Chicago.