The Discourse Tool: A Support Environment for Collaborative Modeling Efforts

This paper describes the first experiences in development and usage of an environment to support a community in collaborative modeling efforts in the area of Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL). With first priority, the domain of interest, the sub-domains and the relationships have to be modeled to have a common understanding and a shared model for the further work and exchange. While the work continues, the model, and the sub-domain models continue to evolve. The tool that is presented here supports the modeling, especially the discourse conducted on the models in the collaborating network. With the tool i) the model rationale can be made transparent, ii) reasoning and agreements on changes in the model or its elements are systematically recorded by issue iii) the semantic wiki functionalities enhance the analysis of the discussion and discussion tracks. With the help of the tool, the community has continuously an updated model version at hand. Community members can raise an issue whenever a change or enhancement in the model is seen necessary. The members can share their updated sub-domain models and model variants for discussion. The tool is called Discourse Tool, since a discursive process is induced for negotiating and decision making on the model issues.

[1]  Mirja Pulkkinen,et al.  Enterprise architecture as a collaboration tool : discursive process for enterprise architecture management, planning and development , 2008 .

[2]  Harith Alani,et al.  The CKC Challenge: Exploring Tools for Collaborative Knowledge Construction , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[3]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Language and Power , 2009 .

[4]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion , 1988, CSCW '88.

[5]  Mike Robinson,et al.  Double-level languages and co-operative working , 2005, AI & SOCIETY.

[6]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Predicting groupware usage , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Modelling Offices Through Discourse Analysis: The SAMPO Approach , 1992, Comput. J..

[8]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993 .

[9]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Designing for cooperation: cooperating in design , 1991, CACM.

[10]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces , 1988, CSCW '88.

[11]  R. Studer,et al.  Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems , 2006 .

[12]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  CSCW: Four Characters in Search of a Context , 1989, ECSCW.

[13]  K. Lyytinen A taxonomic perspective of information systems development: theoretical constructs and recommendations , 1987 .

[14]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Cross-cultural communication and CSCW , 1993 .

[15]  N. Fairclough Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research , 2003 .

[16]  Markus Glaser,et al.  Wiki: Web Collaboration , 2005 .

[17]  Brenda Huettner,et al.  Managing Virtual Teams: Getting The Most From Wikis, Blogs, And Other Collaborative Tools , 2006 .

[18]  Michael Lynch,et al.  Pictures of Nothing? Visual Construals in Social Theory , 1991 .

[19]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Book Reviews : Global Networks: Computers and International Communication Linda M. Harasim (Ed.) Publisher: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 92142 Year of Publication: 1993 Length: 410 pages Price: $29.95 , 1994 .

[21]  Teun A. van Dijk,et al.  Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power , 1989 .

[22]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach , 1997 .

[23]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .