An investigation of the mechanical filtering effect of tactile CMM in the measurement of additively manufactured parts

Abstract The high level of surface roughness of additively manufactured parts post challenges to the applicability of different dimensional measurement techniques, including tactile, optical and X-ray computed tomography. Tactile measurement is traditionally considered to have the best accuracy and traceability; however, its measurement can be significantly influenced by the mechanical filtering effect. This work investigates the influence of the mechanical filtering effect on tactile measurements of additively manufactured parts. Both experimental and simulation work are utilised to reveal this effect. Particularly the numerical simulation based on the morphological method allows a single influence factor e.g. the stylus diameter to be investigated. The maximum measurement errors caused by the stylus mechanical filtering effect are determined by the convex hull points of the measurement profile, which is equivalent to using an infinitely large stylus. Coordinate measuring machine and X-ray computed tomography measurement results of an additively manufactured test part’s cylinder diameters are compared, along with the application of morphological method to “compensate” the coordinate measuring machine’s mechanical filtering effect.

[1]  Simone Carmignato,et al.  Influence of surface roughness on X-ray computed tomography dimensional measurements of additive manufactured parts , 2016 .

[2]  Michael Dietzsch,et al.  `Real mechanical profile' — the new approach for nano-measurements , 2005 .

[3]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  TOPICAL REVIEW: Bandwidth characteristics and comparisons of surface texture measuring instruments , 2010 .

[4]  Henk J. A. M. Heijmans,et al.  Mathematical Morphology: A Modern Approach in Image Processing Based on Algebra and Geometry , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[5]  Paul J. Scott,et al.  Morphological filters for functional assessment of roundness profiles , 2014 .

[6]  Michael Salamon,et al.  Industrial X-ray Computed Tomography Scanners , 2017 .

[7]  Paul J. Scott,et al.  Geometric computation theory for morphological filtering on freeform surfaces , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  A. Weckenmann,et al.  Probing Systems in Dimensional Metrology , 2004 .

[9]  S. Carmignato,et al.  Accuracy of industrial computed tomography measurements: Experimental results from an international comparison , 2012 .

[10]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Surfaces and their Measurement , 2002 .

[11]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Computed tomography for dimensional metrology , 2011 .

[12]  Xiaoping Qian,et al.  General three-dimensional image simulation and surface reconstruction in scanning probe microscopy using a dexel representation. , 2007, Ultramicroscopy.

[13]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Uncertainty in measurement for x-ray-computed tomography using calibrated work pieces , 2010 .

[14]  J. Villarrubia Algorithms for Scanned Probe Microscope Image Simulation, Surface Reconstruction, and Tip Estimation , 1997, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[15]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Influence of surface roughness on computed tomography dimensional measurements , 2017 .

[16]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Roughness offset differences between contact and non-contact measurements , 2015 .

[17]  I. Buvat,et al.  Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Paul J. Scott,et al.  Applications of Morphological Operations in Surface Metrology and Dimensional Metrology , 2014 .

[19]  Biserka Runje,et al.  Influence of object surface roughness in CT dimensional measurements , 2017, ICT 2017.

[20]  P. M. Lonardo,et al.  Emerging trends in surface metrology , 2002 .