Clinical Relevance of Prognostic Factors in Axillary Node-Negative Breast Cancer

In node-negative breast cancer, advices for adjuvant therapy are based on traditional factors like age, tumour size, grade of differentiation, and steroid hormone receptor status. Several new factors that may better describe tumour behaviour, like proliferation rate (determined by thymidine labelling index, S-phase fraction, mitotic index, or Ki-67), presence of disseminated tumour cells, as well as expression of invasion factors (urokinase-type plasminogen activator uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1) and of cell cycle genes (cyclin E), as well as gene expression patterns (‘genomic profiling’) are currently discussed as future methods of risk assessment and also as tools for prediction of response to specific therapy modalities. Recommendations for routine use should be based on criteria of evidence-based medicine and on their impact on clinical decision making. Among the aforementioned factors, only the invasion factors uPA and PAI-1 have reached the highest levels of evidence and are mature enough to be transferred into clinical routine: their prognostic impact has been shown in several retrospective and prospective studies and in a pooled analysis of almost 3,500 node-negative patients. Their clinical impact was demonstrated in a prospective therapy trial. In addition, a predictive value with regard to chemotherapy efficacy has recently been supposed. Thus, in order to correctly assess the individual risk and to design an adequate adjuvant treatment plan for node-negative breast cancer patients, we recommend to use uPA and PAI-1 as additional criteria together with grading and age.

[1]  R. Gelber,et al.  Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Fernö,et al.  Expression of cyclins E, A, and B, and prognosis in lymph node‐negative breast cancer , 2003, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  Yudong D. He,et al.  A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer , 2002 .

[4]  Isabelle Bedrosian,et al.  Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M. Kiechle,et al.  Clinical utility of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 determination in primary breast cancer tissue for individualized therapy concepts. , 2002, Clinical breast cancer.

[6]  D. Amadori,et al.  Quality Control for Biomarker Determination in Oncology: The Experience of the Italian Network for Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomarkers (INQAT) , 2002, The International journal of biological markers.

[7]  H. Junkermann,et al.  [Evidence-based recommendations on primary treatment of carcinomas of the breast]. , 2002, Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie.

[8]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[9]  N. Brünner,et al.  Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1 in 8377 breast cancer patients. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  K. Pantel,et al.  Occult micrometastasis: enrichment, identification and characterization of single disseminated tumour cells. , 2001, Seminars in cancer biology.

[11]  A. Paradiso,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for patients with fast-proliferating, node-negative breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Mollianne J. McGahren,et al.  Tumor-Specific Proteolytic Processing of Cyclin E Generates Hyperactive Lower-Molecular-Weight Forms , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[13]  C. Sweep,et al.  Randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial in high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  O. Nanni,et al.  Prognostic significance of biologic markers in node-negative breast cancer patients: a prospective study , 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  O. Nanni,et al.  Disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in patients with node-negative, rapidly proliferating breast cancer: a randomized multicenter study. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Mike Clarke,et al.  UK and USA breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20–69 years , 2000, The Lancet.

[17]  T. Dimpfl,et al.  Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  F. Jänicke,et al.  Do we need better prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer? Pro:. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[19]  M G Daidone,et al.  Biological markers as indicators of response to primary and adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[20]  S. Reed,et al.  Deregulated cyclin E induces chromosome instability , 1999, Nature.

[21]  H. Höfler,et al.  Invasion marker PAI‐1 remains a strong prognostic factor after long‐term follow‐up both for primary breast cancer and following first relapse , 1999, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  D. Wallwiener,et al.  Reduction in new metastases in breast cancer with adjuvant clodronate treatment. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Skobe,et al.  Absence of host plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 prevents cancer invasion and vascularization , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[24]  I. Funke,et al.  Meta-analyses of studies on bone marrow micrometastases: an independent prognostic impact remains to be substantiated. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  M. Duffy,et al.  The urokinase‐type plasminogen activator system in cancer metastasis: A review , 1997, International journal of cancer.

[26]  H. Höfler,et al.  Clinical Impact of the Plasminogen Activation System in Tumor Invasion and Metastasis: Prognostic Relevance and Target for Therapy , 1997, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[27]  M. Daidone,et al.  Cell proliferation in 3,800 node‐negative breast cancers: Concistency over time of biological and clinical information provided by 3H‐Thymidine labelling index , 1997, International journal of cancer.

[28]  D. Bortner,et al.  Induction of mammary gland hyperplasia and carcinomas in transgenic mice expressing human cyclin E , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  S. Braun,et al.  Re: Micrometastatic breast cancer cells in bone marrow at primary surgery: prognostic value in comparison with nodal status. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  R. Bast,et al.  Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  Steingrimur Stefansson,et al.  The serpin PAI-1 inhibits cell migration by blocking integrin αvβ3 binding to vitronectin , 1996, Nature.

[32]  S. Hilsenbeck,et al.  Prognostic value of Ki-67 compared to S-phase fraction in axillary node-negative breast cancer. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[33]  H. Allgayer,et al.  Individual development and uPA–receptor expression of disseminated tumour cells in bone marrow: A reference to early systemic disease in solid cancer , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[34]  James M. Roberts,et al.  Human cyclin E, a nuclear protein essential for the G1-to-S phase transition , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[35]  U. Veronesi,et al.  Biologic and clinicopathologic factors as indicators of specific relapse types in node-negative breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  K. Ulm,et al.  Both the cytosols and detergent extracts of breast cancer tissues are suited to evaluate the prognostic impact of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. , 1994, Cancer research.

[37]  W. Eiermann,et al.  Tumour cell detection in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients at primary therapy: results of a 3-year median follow-up. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[38]  K. Keyomarsi,et al.  Redundant cyclin overexpression and gene amplification in breast cancer cells. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  J. Winstanley,et al.  Long-term prognostic significance of thymidine labelling index in primary breast cancer. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[40]  F. Clayton Pathologic correlates of survival in 378 lymph node‐negative infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas. Mitotic count is the best single predictor , 1991, Cancer.

[41]  G M Clark,et al.  How to use prognostic factors in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[42]  M. Fernö,et al.  Indicators of prognosis in node-negative breast cancer. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  S. Koscielny,et al.  Growth rate, kinetics of tumor cell proliferation and long‐term outcome in human breast cancer , 1989, International journal of cancer.

[44]  R. Coombes,et al.  The fate of bone marrow micrometastases in patients with primary breast cancer. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  M Héry,et al.  Factors affecting relapse in node-negative breast cancer. A multivariate analysis including the labeling index. , 1989, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[46]  M. Duffy,et al.  Urokinase‐plasminogen activator, a marker for aggressive breast carcinomas. Preliminary report , 1988, Cancer.

[47]  M. Daidone,et al.  Cell kinetics as a prognostic marker in node‐negative breast cancer , 1985, Cancer.

[48]  H. Skipper,et al.  Kinetics of mammary tumor cell growth and implications for therapy , 1971, Cancer.

[49]  H. Höfler,et al.  Urokinase (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1 are strong and independent prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[50]  N. Harbeck,et al.  Minimal residual disease in breast cancer and gynecological malignancies: phenotype and clinical relevance. , 2003, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[51]  Van,et al.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  I. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Cyclin E immunoexpression in breast ductal carcinoma: pathologic correlations and prognostic implications. , 2001, Human pathology.

[53]  H Sommer,et al.  Lack of effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the elimination of single dormant tumor cells in bone marrow of high-risk breast cancer patients. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  G. Clark,et al.  S-phase fraction and breast cancer - a decade of experience , 1998, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[55]  N. Harbeck,et al.  Time-varying prognostic impact of tumour biological factors urokinase (uPA), PAI-1 and steroid hormone receptor status in primary breast cancer. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[56]  K. Keyomarsi,et al.  The role of cyclin E in cell proliferation, development and cancer. , 1997, Progress in cell cycle research.

[57]  R. Holle,et al.  Micrometastatic breast cancer cells in bone marrow at primary surgery: prognostic value in comparison with nodal status. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.