Stroke frequency, but not swimming speed, is related to body size in free-ranging seabirds, pinnipeds and cetaceans

It is obvious, at least qualitatively, that small animals move their locomotory apparatus faster than large animals: small insects move their wings invisibly fast, while large birds flap their wings slowly. However, quantitative observations have been difficult to obtain from free-ranging swimming animals. We surveyed the swimming behaviour of animals ranging from 0.5 kg seabirds to 30 000 kg sperm whales using animal-borne accelerometers. Dominant stroke cycle frequencies of swimming specialist seabirds and marine mammals were proportional to mass−0.29 (R2=0.99, n=17 groups), while propulsive swimming speeds of 1–2 m s−1 were independent of body size. This scaling relationship, obtained from breath-hold divers expected to swim optimally to conserve oxygen, does not agree with recent theoretical predictions for optimal swimming. Seabirds that use their wings for both swimming and flying stroked at a lower frequency than other swimming specialists of the same size, suggesting a morphological trade-off with wing size and stroke frequency representing a compromise. In contrast, foot-propelled diving birds such as shags had similar stroke frequencies as other swimming specialists. These results suggest that muscle characteristics may constrain swimming during cruising travel, with convergence among diving specialists in the proportions and contraction rates of propulsive muscles.

[1]  C. A. Hui,et al.  Penguin Swimming. I. Hydrodynamics , 1988, Physiological Zoology.

[2]  Katsufumi Sato,et al.  Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume? , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  Sarah Wanless,et al.  Swim speeds and stroke patterns in wing-propelled divers: a comparison among alcids and a penguin , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  Peter L. Tyack,et al.  A digital acoustic recording tag for measuring the response of wild marine mammals to sound , 2003 .

[5]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  A. Bejan,et al.  Unifying constructal theory for scale effects in running, swimming and flying , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Wake mechanics for thrust generation in oscillating foils , 1991 .

[8]  B. Nolet,et al.  Costs of swimming measured at optimum speed: scale effects, differences between swimming styles, taxonomic groups and submerged and surface swimming. , 1990, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[9]  R. McNeill Alexander,et al.  Principles of Animal Locomotion , 2002 .

[10]  Peter L Tyack,et al.  Swimming gaits, passive drag and buoyancy of diving sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  Terrie M. Williams,et al.  The evolution of cost efficient swimming in marine mammals: limits to energetic optimization , 1999 .

[12]  Y. Naito,et al.  Swimming speeds and buoyancy compensation of migrating adult chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta revealed by speed/depth/acceleration data logger. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  Pennycuick Wingbeat frequency of birds in steady cruising flight: new data and improved predictions , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  A. Hill Dimensions of Animals and their Muscular Dynamics , 1949, Nature.

[15]  F. Fish,et al.  Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete cetaceans , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Stroke and glide of wing–propelled divers: deep diving seabirds adjust surge frequency to buoyancy change with depth , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Cassondra L. Williams,et al.  Bioenergetics and diving activity of internesting leatherback turtles Dermochelys coriacea at Parque Nacional Marino Las Baulas, Costa Rica , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Y. Naito,et al.  Why do macaroni penguins choose shallow body angles that result in longer descent and ascent durations? , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Y. Naito,et al.  Emperor penguins adjust swim speed according to the above-water height of ice holes through which they exit , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Direct measurement of the swimming speed, tailbeat, and body angle of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) , 2004 .

[21]  Colin J Pennycuick,et al.  Predicting Wingbeat Frequency and Wavelength of Birds , 1990 .

[22]  Masao Amano,et al.  Sperm whale diving behavior monitored using a suction-cup-attached TDR tag , 2003 .

[23]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Foraging tactics of Baikal seals differ between day and night , 2004 .

[24]  Tomonari Akamatsu,et al.  Diving behaviour of freshwater finless porpoises (Neophocaena phocaenoides) in an oxbow of the Yangtze River, China , 2002 .

[25]  Y. Naito,et al.  Regulation of stroke and glide in a foot-propelled avian diver , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  Christian P. Giardina,et al.  Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high-power efficiency , 2003 .

[27]  L. Johansson,et al.  Kinematics of diving Atlantic puffins (Fratercula arctica L.): evidence for an active upstroke. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Factors affecting stroking patterns and body angle in diving Weddell seals under natural conditions , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.