Ultimate fate of constrained voters

We examine the ultimate fate of individual opinions in a socially interacting population of leftists, centrists and rightists. In an elemental interaction between agents, a centrist and a leftist can both become centrists or both become leftists with equal rates (and similarly for a centrist and a rightist). However leftists and rightists do not interact. This interaction step between pairs of agents is applied repeatedly until the system can no longer evolve. In the mean-field limit, we determine the exact probability that the system reaches consensus (either leftist, rightist or centrist) or a frozen mixture of leftists and rightists as a function of the initial composition of the population. We also determine the mean time until the final state is reached. Some implications of our results for the ultimate fate in a limit of the Axelrod model are discussed.

[1]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Sociodynamics: a Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences , 2000 .

[2]  Marsili,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence , 2000, Physical review letters.

[3]  T. Liggett.  Interacting Particle Systems , 1985 .

[4]  Ben-Naim,et al.  Spatial organization in cyclic Lotka-Volterra systems. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[5]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Meet, discuss, and segregate! , 2002, Complex..

[6]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[7]  G. Haag.  Book review: Sociodynamics–A systematic approach to mathematical modelling in the social sciences, by Wolfgang Weidlich , 2000 .

[8]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[9]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  S. Redner.  A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .

[11]  Tensor-multiscalar theories from multidimensional cosmology. , 1996, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[12]  S. Galam.  Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group , 1990 .

[13]  S. Flügge,et al.  Practical Quantum Mechanics , 1976 .

[14]  Sidney Redner,et al.  A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .

[15]  R. Axelrod.  The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[16]  I. M. Pyshik,et al.  Table of integrals, series, and products , 1965 .

[17]  S. Redner,et al.  Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[18]  E. Ben-Naim,et al.  Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes , 2002, cond-mat/0212313.

[19]  S. Galam.  Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0 , 1997, cond-mat/9702163.

[20]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[21]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Ordering phase transition in the one-dimensional Axelrod model , 2002 .