Effect of breast cancer phenotype on diagnostic performance of MRI in the prediction to response to neoadjuvant treatment.

AIM The estimation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is useful in the surgical decision in breast cancer. We addressed the diagnostic reliability of conventional MRI, of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and of a merged criterion coupling morphological MRI and DWI. Diagnostic performance was analysed separately in different tumor subtypes, including HER2+ (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)/HR+ (hormone receptor) (hybrid phenotype). MATERIALS AND METHODS Two-hundred and twenty-five patients underwent MRI before and after NAC. The response to treatment was defined according to the RECIST classification and the evaluation of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The complete pathological response - pCR was assessed (Mandard classification). RESULTS Tumor phenotypes were Luminal (63.6%), Triple Negative (16.4%), HER2+ (7.6%) or Hybrid (12.4%). After NAC, pCR was observed in 17.3% of cases. Average ADC was statistically higher after NAC (p<0.001) among patients showing pCR vs. those who had not pCR. The RECIST classification showed adequate performance in predicting the pCR in Triple Negative (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC AUC=0.9) and in the HER2+ subgroup (AUC=0.826). Lower performance was found in the Luminal and Hybrid subgroups (AUC 0.693 and 0.611, respectively), where the ADC criterion yielded an improved performance (AUC=0.787 and 0.722). The coupling of morphological and DWI criteria yielded maximally improved performance in the Luminal and Hybrid subgroups (AUC=0.797 and 0.761). CONCLUSION The diagnostic reliability of MRI in predicting the pCR to NAC depends on the tumor phenotype, particularly in the Luminal and Hybrid subgroups. In these cases, the coupling of morphological MRI evaluation and DWI assessment may facilitate the diagnosis.

[1]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[2]  A. Soran,et al.  MRI Staging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Does Tumor Biology Affect Accuracy? , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  J. Ahn,et al.  Accuracy of MRI for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: Relation to response patterns on MRI , 2007, Acta oncologica.

[4]  J. Bloem,et al.  RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline , 2009, European Radiology.

[5]  M. Kurosumi,et al.  Analysis of complete response by MRI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts pathological tumor responses differently for molecular subtypes of breast cancer. , 2013, Oncology letters.

[6]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for assessing tumor response in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with molecular biomarker profile. , 2012, Clinical breast cancer.

[7]  Orhan Nalcioglu,et al.  MRI evaluation of pathologically complete response and residual tumors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2008, Cancer.

[8]  S. Rodenhuis,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Les Irwig,et al.  Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  A. Padhani,et al.  Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  L. Brunereau,et al.  Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging underestimates residual disease following neoadjuvant docetaxel based chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  C. Perou,et al.  The Triple Negative Paradox: Primary Tumor Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  Risto A Kauppinen,et al.  Monitoring cytotoxic tumour treatment response by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and proton spectroscopy , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[14]  Ying Lu,et al.  Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  S. Gautam,et al.  Identification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging--comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findings. , 2010, Radiology.

[16]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Breast cancer: evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 3.0-T MR imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[17]  J. Wildberger,et al.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review , 2013, Insights into Imaging.

[18]  Lorenzo Bonomo,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted Imaging in Evaluating the Response to Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment , 2011, The breast journal.

[19]  J. Petiot,et al.  Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations , 1994, Cancer.

[20]  T. Julian,et al.  Accuracy of Clinical Examination, Digital Mammogram, Ultrasound, and MRI in Determining Postneoadjuvant Pathologic Tumor Response in Operable Breast Cancer Patients , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  L. Bonomo,et al.  MRI accuracy in residual disease evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2006, Clinical Radiology.

[22]  G. Torre,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation , 2010, La radiologia medica.

[23]  V. Bardou,et al.  Local and distant failures after limited surgery with positive margins and radiotherapy for node-negative breast cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  M. Ono,et al.  Prognostic impact of Ki-67 labeling indices with 3 different cutoff values, histological grade, and nuclear grade in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancers , 2015, Breast Cancer.

[25]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[26]  Chad J Creighton,et al.  The molecular profile of luminal B breast cancer , 2012, Biologics : targets & therapy.

[27]  E. Rutgers,et al.  MRI-Model to Guide the Surgical Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[28]  Hee Jung Shin,et al.  Prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using diffusion‐weighted imaging and MRS , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[29]  J. D. Santos MRI evaluation of neoadjuvant low-dose fractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer , 2013 .

[30]  E. Yıldırım,et al.  The prognostic importance of triple negative breast carcinoma. , 2008, Breast.