Modeling the Effects of Personality on Team Formation in Self-assembly Teams

Optimizing the performance of teams in modern organizations is an important managerial function, and particularly so in contexts where new teams must continually be formed voluntarily, such as with software development, crowd-sourcing platforms, and even the formation of scientific collaborative teams. In many such cases, team performance is significantly influenced by the makeup of participant personalities and temperaments and goes beyond the analysis of individual skills. In this study, we present a team-assemblage model that is primarily influenced by knowledge of the past performance of team members and their personalities. Our goal is to provide a model, which can be parameterized for specific organizational contexts, for policy makers and managers to assess potential teams formed in dynamic circumstances. To provide real-world validation for our approach, we extracted data from the Python Enhancement Proposal (PEP) process, which involves the repeated self-assembly of software teams from a common pool of developers. We then used agent-based simulation to enact our model with PEP data to predict team grouping formation and resulting team performances.

[1]  John H. Bradley,et al.  The effect of personality type on team performance , 1997 .

[2]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[3]  P. Costa,et al.  NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) : professional manual , 2010 .

[4]  George E. Tita,et al.  Human group formation in online guilds and offline gangs driven by a common team dynamic. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  I. B. Myers The myers-briggs type indicator , 1962 .

[6]  Marco Remondino,et al.  Data mining applied to agent based simulation , 2005 .

[7]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[8]  N. Carter,et al.  The Structure of Founding Teams: Homophily, Strong Ties, and Isolation among U.S. Entrepreneurs , 2003 .

[9]  Ahmed E. Hassan,et al.  What Can OSS Mailing Lists Tell Us? A Preliminary Psychometric Text Analysis of the Apache Developer Mailing List , 2007, Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR'07:ICSE Workshops 2007).

[10]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Some assembly required: leveraging Web science to understand and enable team assembly , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  The Relationship between Work-Team Personality Composition and the Job Performance of Teams , 1999 .

[12]  I. B. Myers The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). , 1962 .

[13]  A. Tziner,et al.  How Team Composition Affects Task Performance: Some Theoretical Insights , 1985 .

[14]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[15]  Karen A. Bantel Strategic Planning Openness , 1994 .