Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

[1]  Alessandro Singlitico,et al.  Short-Term Survivorship of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. , 2022, Orthopedic reviews.

[2]  F. Benazzo,et al.  High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report. , 2022, The Knee.

[3]  J. Victor,et al.  Comparison of different strategies in revision arthroplasty of the knee with severe bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. , 2022, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  J. Argenson,et al.  Trabecular Metal Cones Combined With Short Cemented Stem Allow Favorable Outcomes in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  M. Pagnano,et al.  Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2020, The bone & joint journal.

[6]  D. Berry,et al.  Outcomes of a technique combining diaphyseal impaction grafting and metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2020, The bone & joint journal.

[7]  T. Gehrke,et al.  Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  A. Malkani,et al.  Excellent Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Minimum seven-year follow-up study. , 2018, The Knee.

[10]  L. Felli,et al.  The Use of Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for the Management of Severe Bone Defects in Septic Knee Revision. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  D. Bohl,et al.  Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  C. Haasper,et al.  Are Trabecular Metal Cones a Valid Option to Treat Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty? , 2017, Joints.

[13]  Seung Hoon Lee,et al.  Comparative Analysis between Cone and Sleeve in Managing Severe Bone Defect during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[14]  N. Sheth,et al.  Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management. , 2017, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[15]  M. Pagnano,et al.  Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2017, Journal of Arthroplasty.

[16]  R. Meneghini,et al.  Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  R. Molloy,et al.  Can Preoperative Radiographic Analysis Help Us Evaluate When to Use Metaphyseal Cones? , 2016, Journal of Knee Surgery.

[18]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  A. Hanssen,et al.  The management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: rebuild, reinforce, and augment. , 2016, The bone & joint journal.

[20]  D. Dennis,et al.  Development of a Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System and Methodology for Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  H. Graichen,et al.  Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal Fixation in Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Sleeves-Short-Term Results. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  P. Sculco,et al.  Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  R. Bitsch,et al.  Treatment of severe bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty with structural allografts and porous metal cones-a systematic review. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  W. Mihalko,et al.  Stem pain after cementless revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2015, Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances.

[26]  C. Chun,et al.  Clinical and radiological results of femoral head structural allograft for severe bone defects in revision TKA--a minimum 8-year follow-up. , 2014, The Knee.

[27]  D. Backstein,et al.  Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  B. Rao,et al.  Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[29]  A. Rıos-Luna,et al.  Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[30]  A. Crocombe,et al.  Analysis of stem tip pain in revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  P-C Lin,et al.  Reconstruction using femoral head allograft in revision total knee replacement: an experience in Asian patients. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[32]  T. Vail,et al.  Can Tantalum Cones Provide Fixation in Complex Revision Knee Arthroplasty? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  J. Howard,et al.  Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[34]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[35]  M. Berend,et al.  Static and Mobile Antibiotic‐impregnated Cement Spacers for the Management of Prosthetic Joint Infection , 2009, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[36]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Distal Femoral Replacement in Nontumor Cases with Severe Bone Loss and Instability , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[38]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Limitations of Structural Allograft in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  D. Ammeen,et al.  Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Management of Bone Loss: Augments, Cones, Offset Stems , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  C. Peters,et al.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[43]  D. Dennis,et al.  The structural allograft composite in revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Orthopedics.

[44]  D. Ammeen,et al.  Augments and allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: usage and outcome using one modular revision prosthesis. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[45]  R. Bourne,et al.  The fate of augments to treat type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[46]  J. Lonner,et al.  Impaction Grafting and Wire Mesh for Uncontained Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[47]  R. Jones,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge prosthesis. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[48]  A. Gross,et al.  The Use of Structural Allograft for Uncontained Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum Five-Year Review , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[49]  D. Ammeen,et al.  Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. , 1999, Instructional course lectures.

[50]  G. Engh,et al.  Histology of Nine Structural Bone Grafts Used in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1997 .

[51]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[52]  J. Insall,et al.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[53]  P. J. Tsahakis,et al.  Technique and results of allograft reconstruction in revision total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[54]  T. Malinin,et al.  Massive allografts in salvage revisions of failed total knee arthroplasties. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[55]  C. Engh,et al.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[56]  F. C. Ewald.  The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[57]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.